BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34027468)

  • 1. The Effect of Torque Differences for All-Suture Anchor Fixation Strength: A Biomechanical Analysis.
    Lacheta L; Miles J; Douglass B; Millett P
    Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2021 Apr; 3(2):e549-e554. PubMed ID: 34027468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical Evaluation of Knotless and Knotted All-Suture Anchor Repair Constructs in 4 Bankart Repair Configurations.
    Lacheta L; Brady A; Rosenberg SI; Dornan GJ; Dekker TJ; Anderson N; Altintas B; Krob JJ; Millett PJ
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Jun; 36(6):1523-1532. PubMed ID: 32057982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical Analysis of Anteroinferior Bankart Repair Anchor Types.
    Yanke AB; Allahabadi S; Wang Z; Credille KT; Shewman E; Bonadiman JA; Elias TJ; Hevesi M; Garrigues GE; Verma NN
    Am J Sports Med; 2023 Aug; 51(10):2642-2649. PubMed ID: 37345254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical Comparison of Knotless All-Suture Anchors and Knotted All-Suture Anchors in Type II SLAP Lesions: A Cadaveric Study.
    Nolte PC; Midtgaard KS; Ciccotti M; Miles JW; Tanghe KK; Lacheta L; Millett PJ
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2094-2102. PubMed ID: 32591261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proximal Hamstring Repair: A Biomechanical Analysis of Variable Suture Anchor Constructs.
    Gerhardt MB; Assenmacher BS; Chahla J
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2019 Feb; 7(2):2325967118824149. PubMed ID: 30783606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of a knotless suture anchor with standard suture anchor in the repair of type II SLAP tears.
    Sileo MJ; Lee SJ; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo K; Ben-Avi S; McHugh M; Nicholas SJ
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Apr; 25(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 19341920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remplissage Using Interconnected Knotless Anchors: Superior Biomechanical Properties to a Knotted Technique?
    Funakoshi T; Hartzler R; Stewien E; Burkhart S
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Nov; 34(11):2954-2959. PubMed ID: 30292597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical analysis of arthroscopically assisted latissimus dorsi transfer fixation for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears-Knotless versus knotted anchors.
    Ernstbrunner L; Borbas P; Rohner M; Brun S; Bachmann E; Bouaicha S; Wieser K
    J Orthop Res; 2021 Oct; 39(10):2234-2242. PubMed ID: 33331664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biomechanical analysis of anterior Bankart repair using suture anchors.
    Nho SJ; Frank RM; Van Thiel GS; Wang FC; Wang VM; Provencher MT; Verma NN
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jul; 38(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 20360604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knotted versus knotless suture bridge repair of the achilles tendon insertion: a biomechanical study.
    Cox JT; Shorten PL; Gould GC; Markert RJ; Barnett MD; Laughlin RT
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Nov; 42(11):2727-33. PubMed ID: 25225681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Knotless anchors offer better prevention of meniscal excursion than knotted anchors: An experimental study of the bovine knee.
    Eren MB; Aşçı M; Tönük E; Balta O; Kurnaz R
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2020 Jan; 54(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 32175903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Knotless Anchors in Acetabular Labral Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison.
    Safran MR; Behn AW; Botser IB; Mardones R
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Jan; 35(1):70-76.e1. PubMed ID: 30473457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ability to Retension Knotless Suture Anchors: A Biomechanical Analysis of Simulated Bankart Lesions.
    LeVasseur MR; Mancini MR; Williams N; Obopilwe E; Cote MP; Coyner KJ; Arciero RA; Caldwell PE; Mazzocca AD
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2022 Jun; 10(6):23259671221098726. PubMed ID: 35734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Knotless Fixation Is Stronger and Less Variable Than Knotted Constructs in Securing a Suture Loop.
    Denard PJ; Adams CR; Fischer NC; Piepenbrink M; Wijdicks CA
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2018 May; 6(5):2325967118774000. PubMed ID: 29845084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. All-Suture Anchors: Biomechanical Analysis of Pullout Strength, Displacement, and Failure Mode.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Jun; 33(6):1113-1121. PubMed ID: 28017468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical comparison of knotless vs. knotted suture anchors in the acetabular rim with respect to bone density.
    Benca E; Dlaska CE; DiFranco MD; Hobusch GM; Windhager R; Angeli T; von Skrbensky G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Apr; 74():21-26. PubMed ID: 32109719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cyclic biomechanical testing of biocomposite lateral row knotless anchors in a human cadaveric model.
    Barber FA; Bava ED; Spenciner DB; Piccirillo J
    Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 23578366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro comparison of standard and Knotless metal suture anchors.
    Zumstein M; Jacob HA; Schneeberger AG
    Arthroscopy; 2004 May; 20(5):517-20. PubMed ID: 15122142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications and Return to Activity After Arthroscopic Repair of Isolated Type II SLAP Lesions: A Systematic Review Comparing Knotted Versus Knotless Suture Anchors.
    Knapik DM; Kolaczko JG; Gillespie RJ; Salata MJ; Voos JE
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2020 Apr; 8(4):2325967120911361. PubMed ID: 32341926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Biomechanical Failure Loads Between Tape-Type and Conventional Sutures in Internal Knotless Anchor-Based Constructs.
    Chuang HC; Yen JZ; Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Chen Y; Chang HM; Su WR
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2022 Mar; 10(3):23259671211072523. PubMed ID: 35356310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.