195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34027621)
1. Perceptual distraction causes visual memory encoding intrusions.
Dube B; Golomb JD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1592-1600. PubMed ID: 34027621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inhibition continues to guide search under concurrent visual working memory load.
Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
J Vis; 2022 Feb; 22(2):8. PubMed ID: 35156992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.
Foerster RM; Schneider WX
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2379-2392. PubMed ID: 32166644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oculomotor capture reveals trial-by-trial neural correlates of attentional guidance by contents of visual working memory.
Beck VM; Vickery TJ
Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():159-169. PubMed ID: 30392969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Memory-driven Attentional Capture.
Gao Z; Yu S; Zhu C; Shui R; Weng X; Li P; Shen M
Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():22822. PubMed ID: 26956084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
Foerster RM; Schneider WX
Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
Berggren N; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple states in visual working memory: Evidence from oculomotor capture by memory-matching distractors.
Beck VM; Vickery TJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1340-1346. PubMed ID: 31037604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
Hollingworth A; Beck VM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
Kerzel D; Witzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.
Lorenc ES; Sreenivasan KK; Nee DE; Vandenbroucke ARE; D'Esposito M
J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(23):5267-5276. PubMed ID: 29739867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.
Bahle B; Beck VM; Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):992-1011. PubMed ID: 29629781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Irrelevant features of distractors in intervening visual search tasks cause active visual working memory interference - the more difficult the search task, the more interference it causes.
Lively Z; Ng GJP; Buetti S; Lleras A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2410-2429. PubMed ID: 33977408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visual mental imagery influences attentional guidance in a visual-search task.
Moriya J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1127-1142. PubMed ID: 29654532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection.
Kerzel D; Andres MK
Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104158. PubMed ID: 31986352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.
Fan L; Zhang L; Diao L; Xu M; Chen R; Zhang X
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):459-470. PubMed ID: 32988297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Priming effect of individual similarity and ensemble perception in visual search and working memory.
Lin W; Qian J
Psychol Res; 2024 Apr; 88(3):719-734. PubMed ID: 38127115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
