These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34027621)

  • 21. Two visual working memory representations simultaneously control attention.
    Chen Y; Du F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6107. PubMed ID: 28733668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Concurrent guidance of attention by multiple working memory items: Behavioral and computational evidence.
    Zhou C; Lorist MM; Mathôt S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2950-2962. PubMed ID: 32394070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Steady-state Visual Evoked Potentials Reveal Dynamic (Re)allocation of Spatial Attention during Maintenance and Utilization of Visual Working Memory.
    Chota S; Bruat AT; Van der Stigchel S; Strauch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 May; 36(5):800-814. PubMed ID: 38261370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.
    Adam KCS; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual Distraction Disrupts Category-tuned Attentional Filters in Ventral Visual Cortex.
    Dube B; Pidaparthi L; Golomb JD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Jul; 34(8):1521-1533. PubMed ID: 35579979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.
    Wu Y; Pan Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):760-770. PubMed ID: 35359229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Task-irrelevant memories rapidly gain attentional control with learning.
    Gunseli E; Olivers CNL; Meeter M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 26436527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Learned reward association improves visual working memory.
    Gong M; Li S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):841-56. PubMed ID: 24392741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.
    Gaspar JM; Christie GJ; Prime DJ; Jolicœur P; McDonald JJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(13):3693-8. PubMed ID: 26903654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Vision (Basel); 2019 Aug; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 31735843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can you have multiple attentional templates? Large-scale replications of Van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, and Olivers (2014) and Hollingworth and Beck (2016).
    Frătescu M; Van Moorselaar D; Mathôt S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2700-2709. PubMed ID: 31309532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of search-irrelevant working memory content on visual search.
    Calleja MO; Willoughby AR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 36596986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Feature-based guidance of attention by visual working memory is applied independently of remembered object location.
    Hollingworth A; Bahle B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 31140137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Opposing effects of stimulus-driven and memory-driven attention in visual search.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 31236897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
    Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing the temporal dynamics and efficacy of task-relevant and task-irrelevant memory-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 35001208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Local and interregional alpha EEG dynamics dissociate between memory for search and memory for recognition.
    van Driel J; Gunseli E; Meeter M; Olivers CNL
    Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 149():114-128. PubMed ID: 28132933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search.
    Hollingworth A; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):936-49. PubMed ID: 19429970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attentional selection is a sufficient cause for visual working memory interference.
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2023 Jul; 23(7):15. PubMed ID: 37486298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ventral fronto-parietal contributions to the disruption of visual working memory storage.
    Hakun JG; Ravizza SM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):783-793. PubMed ID: 26436710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.