133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34028115)
1. Pelvic and neonatal size correlations in light of evolutionary hypotheses.
Frémondière P; Thollon L; Marchal F
Am J Hum Biol; 2022 Feb; 34(2):e23619. PubMed ID: 34028115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternal pelvic dimensions and neonatal size: Implications for growth plasticity in early life as adaptation.
Wells JCK; Figueiroa JN; Alves JG
Evol Med Public Health; 2017; 2017(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 29423225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma.
Pavličev M; Romero R; Mitteroecker P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 222(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 31251927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anthropometric measurements in the diagnosis of pelvic size: an analysis of maternal height and shoe size and computed tomography pelvimetric data.
Awonuga AO; Merhi Z; Awonuga MT; Samuels TA; Waller J; Pring D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Nov; 276(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 17458554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maternal height, birthweight, obstetric conjugate and their influence on the management of parturients with a previous cesarean scar.
Mahmood TA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1989; 68(7):595-8. PubMed ID: 2631526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic External Pelvimetry Test in Third Trimester Pregnant Women: Shifting Positions Affect Pelvic Biomechanics and Create More Room in Obstetric Diameters.
Siccardi M; Valle C; Di Matteo F
Cureus; 2021 Mar; 13(3):e13631. PubMed ID: 33816030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obstetric pelvimetry by three-dimensional computed tomography in non-pregnant Japanese women: a retrospective single-center study.
Nishikawa S; Miki M; Chigusa Y; Furuta M; Kido A; Kawamura Y; Ueda Y; Mandai M; Mogami H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(1):2190444. PubMed ID: 36927362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal pelvic index to predict cephalopelvic disproportion - a retrospective clinical cohort study.
Korhonen U; Taipale P; Heinonen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jun; 94(6):615-21. PubMed ID: 25682690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The birth canal: correlation between the pubic arch angle, the interspinous diameter, and the obstetrical conjugate: a computed tomography biometric study in reproductive age women.
Perlman S; Raviv-Zilka L; Levinsky D; Gidron A; Achiron R; Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Oct; 32(19):3255-3265. PubMed ID: 29621904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the variability in the dimensions of the intact pelvic canal in South Africans: A pilot study.
Jagesur S; Wiid A; Pretorius S; Bosman MC; Oettlé AC
Homo; 2017 Jan; 68(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 27986276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study.
Liselele HB; Boulvain M; Tshibangu KC; Meuris S
BJOG; 2000 Aug; 107(8):947-52. PubMed ID: 10955423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance pelvimetry: A new technique for evaluating the female pelvis in pregnancy.
Liao KD; Yu YH; Li YG; Chen L; Peng C; Liu P; Chen CL; Chen RY; Zhong M; Wang Y
Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():208-212. PubMed ID: 29685537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A safe, low-cost, easy-to-use 3D camera platform to assess risk of obstructed labor due to cephalopelvic disproportion.
Gleason RL; Yigeremu M; Debebe T; Teklu S; Zewdeneh D; Weiler M; Frank N; Tolentino L; Attia S; Dixon JB; Kwon C; Pokutta-Paskaleva A; Gleason KA
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203865. PubMed ID: 30216374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Which Foetal-Pelvic Variables Are Useful for Predicting Caesarean Section and Instrumental Assistance?
Frémondière P; Thollon L; Adalian P; Delotte J; Marchal F
Med Princ Pract; 2017; 26(4):359-367. PubMed ID: 28538223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relation between Head Circumference and Mid-Pelvic Circumference: A Simple Index for Cephalopelvic Disproportion Evaluation.
Liberty G; Gemer O; Siyanov I; Anteby EY; Apter A; Cohen SM; Bord I; Yagel S
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2021; 48(11-12):840-848. PubMed ID: 34879366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The obstetric dilemma: an ancient game of Russian roulette, or a variable dilemma sensitive to ecology?
Wells JC; DeSilva JM; Stock JT
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2012; 149 Suppl 55():40-71. PubMed ID: 23138755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia.
Spörri S; Hänggi W; Braghetti A; Vock P; Schneider H
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 89(6):902-8. PubMed ID: 9170462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing cephalopelvic disproportion: back to the basics.
Maharaj D
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2010 Jun; 65(6):387-95. PubMed ID: 20633305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. X-RAY PELVIMETRY.
BARRON LR; HILL RO; LINKLETTER AM
Can Med Assoc J; 1964 Dec; 91(23):1209-12. PubMed ID: 14226095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A narrow pelvic outlet increases the risk for emergency cesarean section.
Stålberg K; Bodestedt A; Lyrenäs S; Axelsson O
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):821-4. PubMed ID: 16817080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
