These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34028332)
1. Interleaved Acoustic Environments: Impact of an Auditory Scene Classification Procedure on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users. Eichenauer A; Baumann U; Stöver T; Weissgerber T Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014118. PubMed ID: 34028332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants. Gifford RH; Olund AP; DeJong M J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):623-632. PubMed ID: 22192607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants. Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise. Gifford RH; Revit LJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):441-51; quiz 487-8. PubMed ID: 20807480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Speech perception in modulated noise assessed in bimodal CI users-German version]. Weißgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U HNO; 2023 Aug; 71(8):487-493. PubMed ID: 37395783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech perception in modulated noise assessed in bimodal CI users. Weißgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U HNO; 2024 Jan; 72(Suppl 1):10-16. PubMed ID: 37552279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech-in-Noise Recognition With More Realistic Implementations of a Binaural Cochlear-Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex. Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Fumero MJ; Gorospe JM; Polo López R; Gutiérrez Revilla MA; Schatzer R; Nopp P; Stohl JS Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1492-1510. PubMed ID: 33136626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit. Prejban DA; Hamzavi JS; Arnoldner C; Liepins R; Honeder C; Kaider A; Gstöttner W; Baumgartner WD; Riss D Otol Neurotol; 2018 Oct; 39(9):e803-e809. PubMed ID: 30199498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users. Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users. Kerber S; Seeber BU Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Polak M; Driscoll CL; Roland P; Buchman CA Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 23446225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of Directional Microphones in Bilateral/Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users-Impact of Spatial and Temporal Noise Characteristics. Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e551-e557. PubMed ID: 29135876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison. Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]