These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34028332)

  • 21. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [On the effect of reverberation on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners].
    Mühler R; Ziese M; Rostalski D; Verhey JL
    HNO; 2014 Jan; 62(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 24270967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of fluctuating maskers on speech understanding of high-performing cochlear implant users.
    Zirn S; Polterauer D; Keller S; Hemmert W
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):295-304. PubMed ID: 26865377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. STARR: a speech test for evaluation of the effectiveness of auditory prostheses under realistic conditions.
    Boyle PJ; Nunn TB; O'Connor AF; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 23135616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of Reverberation on Speech Perception and Sound Localization Accuracy in Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.
    Körtje M; Eichenauer A; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan; 43(1):e30-e37. PubMed ID: 34524223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Criteria for Selecting an Optimal Device for the Contralateral Ear of Children with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant.
    Jeong SW; Kang MY; Kim LS
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 26277845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
    Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single-Sided Deafness: Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Speech Perception in Complex Noise and on Auditory Localization Accuracy.
    Döge J; Baumann U; Weissgerber T; Rader T
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e563-e569. PubMed ID: 29135878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of different signal processing options in unilateral and bilateral cochlear freedom implant recipients using R-Space background noise.
    Brockmeyer AM; Potts LG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Feb; 22(2):65-80. PubMed ID: 21463562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. SoftVoice Improves Speech Recognition and Reduces Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Stronks HC; Apperloo E; Koning R; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 32796352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Test-Retest Reliability of the Coordinate Response Measure in Adults with Normal Hearing or Cochlear Implants.
    Saleh SM; Saeed SR; Vickers D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 36812898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Benefit of directional microphones for unilateral, bilateral and bimodal cochlear implant users.
    Ernst A; Anton K; Brendel M; Battmer RD
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):147-157. PubMed ID: 30760180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments.
    Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Simulation of speech perception with cochlear implants : Influence of frequency and level of fundamental frequency components with electronic acoustic stimulation].
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27670421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of Microphone Configuration on Speech Perception of Cochlear Implant Users in Traffic Noise.
    Weissgerber T; Bandeira M; Brendel M; Stöver T; Baumann U
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e198-e205. PubMed ID: 30741896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Binaural summation, binaural unmasking and fluctuating masker benefit in bimodal and bilateral adult cochlear implant users.
    de Graaff F; Eikelboom RH; Sucher C; Kramer SE; Smits C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Sep; 22(5):245-256. PubMed ID: 33832408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
    Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.