These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34028507)

  • 1. A Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Youth Smoking and a Ban on Sales of Flavored Tobacco Products in San Francisco, California.
    Friedman AS
    JAMA Pediatr; 2021 Aug; 175(8):863-865. PubMed ID: 34028507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clarification and Correction of Survey Wave Collection Dates in an Analysis of Youth Smoking and a Ban on Sales of Flavored Tobacco Products in San Francisco, California.
    Friedman AS
    JAMA Pediatr; 2022 Sep; 176(9):947. PubMed ID: 35849391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Youth tobacco use before and after flavoured tobacco sales restrictions in Oakland, California and San Francisco, California.
    Liu J; Hartman L; Tan ASL; Winickoff JP
    Tob Control; 2023 Apr; 32(e1):e118-e120. PubMed ID: 35301257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defeating JUUL's Effort to Rewrite San Francisco's E-Cigarette Regulations.
    Sircar NR; Glantz SA
    Am J Public Health; 2021 Mar; 111(3):457-464. PubMed ID: 33476232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Demographics, Tobacco Use, and Tobacco Control Measures of California Cities With Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions.
    Dove MS; Zheng S; Pakdaman S; Chen-Sankey J
    Health Promot Pract; 2024 May; 25(3):455-459. PubMed ID: 36416061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Public perceptions of the ban on tobacco sales in San Francisco pharmacies.
    Kroon LA; Corelli RL; Roth AP; Hudmon KS
    Tob Control; 2013 Nov; 22(6):369-71. PubMed ID: 23172399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. San Francisco Voters End the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products Despite Strong Industry Opposition.
    Yang YT; Glantz S
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Nov; 169(10):708-709. PubMed ID: 30304334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New York City flavoured tobacco product sales ban evaluation.
    Farley SM; Johns M
    Tob Control; 2017 Jan; 26(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 26872486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. San Francisco Voters End the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products.
    Yang YT; Glantz S
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Jun; 170(12):907-908. PubMed ID: 31207627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. San Francisco Voters End the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products.
    Braillon A
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Jun; 170(12):907. PubMed ID: 31207626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review.
    Cadham CJ; Sanchez-Romero LM; Fleischer NL; Mistry R; Hirschtick JL; Meza R; Levy DT
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Jul; 20(1):1055. PubMed ID: 32641026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facilitators and Barriers to Passing Local Policies That Prohibit the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products: Qualitative Analysis of Strategies Implemented by 36 Communities in California, 2017-2021.
    Hellesen S; Haun S; Dove MS
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2024 May; 21():E36. PubMed ID: 38815050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of flavored E-cigarette bans in the United States: What does the evidence show?
    Siegel M; Katchmar A
    Prev Med; 2022 Dec; 165(Pt B):107063. PubMed ID: 35452711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation of the New York City Policy Restricting Sales of Flavored Non-Cigarette Tobacco Products.
    Brown EM; Rogers T; Eggers ME; Cavazos ML; O'Brien MS; McCrae T; Farley SM; Schroth KRJ
    Health Educ Behav; 2019 Oct; 46(5):782-789. PubMed ID: 31170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are California's Local Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions Effective in Reducing the Retail Availability of Flavored Tobacco Products? A Multicomponent Evaluation.
    Andersen-Rodgers E; Zhang X; Vuong TD; Hendrix L; Edora C; Williams RJ; Groves L; Roeseler A; Rogers T; Voelker DH; Schleicher NC; Johnson TO; Henriksen L
    Eval Rev; 2021; 45(3-4):134-165. PubMed ID: 34693773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short-Term Impact of a Flavored Tobacco Restriction: Changes in Youth Tobacco Use in a Massachusetts Community.
    Kingsley M; Setodji CM; Pane JD; Shadel WG; Song G; Robertson J; Kephart L; Henley P; Ursprung WWS
    Am J Prev Med; 2019 Dec; 57(6):741-748. PubMed ID: 31668668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flavored cigar availability in Oakland after a partial ban.
    Schroth KRJ; Kurti M; Delnevo CD
    Addict Behav; 2022 Feb; 125():107150. PubMed ID: 34673362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Support for E-cigarette and Tobacco Control Policies Among Parents of Adolescents.
    Czaplicki L; Perks SN; Liu M; Cuccia A; Patel M; Vallone D; Schillo B
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2020 Jun; 22(7):1139-1147. PubMed ID: 31793996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the Flavored Cigarette Ban on Adolescent Tobacco Use.
    Courtemanche CJ; Palmer MK; Pesko MF
    Am J Prev Med; 2017 May; 52(5):e139-e146. PubMed ID: 28081999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restricting the Sale of Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Flavors.
    Shah SI; Siddiqui S; Krief EM
    Pediatrics; 2021 Sep; 148(3):. PubMed ID: 34408091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.