173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34029174)
1. Perception of autonomy among people who use wheeled mobility assistive devices: Dependence on the type of wheeled assistive technology.
Khalili M; Jonathan C; Hocking N; Van Der Loos M; Mortenson B; Borisoff JF
Assist Technol; 2022 Nov; 34(6):725-733. PubMed ID: 34029174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perception of autonomy among people who use wheeled mobility assistive devices: dependence on environment and contextual factors.
Khalili M; Jonathan C; Hocking N; Van der Loos M; Mortenson WB; Borisoff J
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Oct; 18(7):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 34618618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptions of power-assist devices: interviews with manual wheelchair users.
Khalili M; Eugenio A; Wood A; Van der Loos M; Mortenson WB; Borisoff J
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Jul; 18(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 33904351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Needs for mobility devices, home modifications and personal assistance among Canadians with disabilities.
Giesbrecht EM; Smith EM; Mortenson WB; Miller WC
Health Rep; 2017 Aug; 28(8):9-15. PubMed ID: 29044443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mobility devices for children with physical disabilities: use, satisfaction and impact on participation.
Gudjonsdottir B; Gudmundsdottir SB
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Aug; 18(6):722-729. PubMed ID: 34102088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Self-reported difficulty and preferences of wheeled mobility device users for simulated low-floor bus boarding, interior circulation and disembarking.
D'Souza C; Paquet VL; Lenker JA; Steinfeld E
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):109-121. PubMed ID: 29130752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usability of a navigation application for travel in Quebec City with wheeled mobility device and, further validation of the Evaluation of satisfaction with geospatial assistive technology.
Vincent C; Levac S; Dumont F; Archambault PS; Routhier F; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Feb; 19(2):367-382. PubMed ID: 35730247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of satisfaction with geospatial assistive technology (ESGAT): a methodological and usability study.
Vincent C; Girard R; Dumont F; Archambault P; Routhier F; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Feb; 17(2):134-151. PubMed ID: 32501781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional mobility assessment is reliable and correlated with satisfaction, independence and skills.
Paulisso DC; Schmeler MR; Schein RM; Allegretti ALC; Campos LCB; Costa JD; Fachin-Martins E; Cruz DMCD
Assist Technol; 2021 Sep; 33(5):264-270. PubMed ID: 31207193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Disabled-by-design: effects of inaccessible urban public spaces on users of mobility assistive devices - a systematic review.
Kapsalis E; Jaeger N; Hale J
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):604-622. PubMed ID: 35984675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Iranian translation and psychometric of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with Assistive technology (QUEST2.0) on wheelchair users.
DavoudianTalab AH; Mokaramiyan S; Kamari Ghanavati F
Disabil Rehabil; 2024 May; 46(10):2125-2129. PubMed ID: 37198952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of two power assist systems for manual wheelchairs for usability, performance and mobility: a pilot study.
Flockhart EW; Miller WC; Campbell JA; Mattie JL; Borisoff JF
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Nov; 18(8):1290-1302. PubMed ID: 34807781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One size does not fit all-mobility device type affects speed, collisions, fatigue, and pain.
Hoenig H; Morgan M; Montgomery C; Landerman LR; Caves K
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 96(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 25230071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comorbidities and medical complexities of mobility device users: a retrospective study.
LaBerge NB; Detterbeck A; Nooijen CFJ
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Oct; 18(7):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 34472994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pilot Study of a Peer-Led Wheelchair Training Program to Improve Self-Efficacy Using a Manual Wheelchair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Best KL; Miller WC; Huston G; Routhier F; Eng JJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jan; 97(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 26343171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional mobility, employment and safety benefits of seat elevating devices.
Mesoros MJ; Schein RM; Pramana G; Schiappa VJ; Schmeler MR; Dicianno BE
Assist Technol; 2023 Nov; 35(6):471-476. PubMed ID: 36112503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Users' satisfaction and experiences in using assistive devices distributed by a rehabilitation centre in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.
Nuri RP; Xu X; Aldersey HM
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2024 Apr; 19(3):868-877. PubMed ID: 36215415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Nino® Two-Wheeled Power Mobility Device: A Pilot Study.
Mattie J; Tavares J; Matheson B; Smith E; Denison I; Miller WC; Borisoff JF
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Nov; 28(11):2497-2506. PubMed ID: 33006931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Geospatial assistive technologies: potential usability criteria identified from manual wheelchair users.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Nov; 15(8):844-855. PubMed ID: 31226889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of factors from assistive technology professionals that impact timeliness of wheelchair service delivery: a cross-sectional study.
Cuppett M; Schein RM; Pramana G; Dicianno BE; Schmeler MR
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Nov; 18(8):1522-1526. PubMed ID: 35276055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
