These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34029293)

  • 1. Salient cues facilitate automatic processes in prospective memory.
    Zhang J; Xue T; Zhang Z
    Neuroreport; 2021 Jul; 32(10):864-868. PubMed ID: 34029293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of cue salience in prospective memory commission errors in nonperformed nonfocal tasks.
    Mello B; Matos P; Albuquerque PB
    Cogn Process; 2024 Aug; 25(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 38632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
    Hefer C; Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():42-53. PubMed ID: 28711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of age, ongoing task difficulty, and cue salience on preschoolers' prospective memory performance: the role of executive function.
    Mahy CE; Moses LJ; Kliegel M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Nov; 127():52-64. PubMed ID: 24613075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.
    Küper K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():1-11. PubMed ID: 28986084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ERP correlates of target checking are dependent upon the defining features of the prospective memory cues.
    Scolaro A; West R; Cohen AL
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Sep; 93(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 24952215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the sensitivity of event-related potentials to retrieval mode.
    Williams AN; Wilding EL
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103580. PubMed ID: 31255886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of focal and nonfocal cues on the neural correlates of prospective memory: insights from ERPs.
    Cona G; Bisiacchi PS; Moscovitch M
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2630-46. PubMed ID: 23645716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of cue frequency and repetition on prospective memory: an ERP investigation.
    Wilson J; Cutmore TR; Wang Y; Chan RC; Shum DH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 23954303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The control of memory retrieval: insights from event-related potentials.
    Werkle-Bergner M; Mecklinger A; Kray J; Meyer P; Düzel E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):599-614. PubMed ID: 16099369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain and behavioral indices of retrieval mode.
    Herron JE; Wilding EL
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):863-70. PubMed ID: 16698287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of cue detection for prospective memory development across the lifespan.
    Hering A; Wild-Wall N; Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M; Kliegel M; Zinke K
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):289-300. PubMed ID: 27847304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.
    Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: a difficult case for activation theories.
    Gunter TC; Wagner S; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):643-57. PubMed ID: 12965038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: an event-related potential study.
    Fay S; Isingrini M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):615-26. PubMed ID: 16099370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological evidence for flexible goal-directed cue processing during episodic retrieval.
    Herron JE; Evans LH; Wilding EL
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():24-31. PubMed ID: 26892854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in executive functioning modulate age effects on the ERP correlates of retrieval success.
    Angel L; Fay S; Bouazzaoui B; Isingrini M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3540-53. PubMed ID: 20709089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT
    Cogn Psychol; 2013; 67(1-2):55-71. PubMed ID: 23916951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.