These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34029319)

  • 1. Characterizing missed identifications and errors in latent fingerprint comparisons using eye-tracking data.
    Busey TA; Heise N; Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251674. PubMed ID: 34029319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gaze behavior and cognitive states during fingerprint target group localization.
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Busey TA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Apr; 4(1):12. PubMed ID: 30953242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with latent fingerprint exclusion determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():65-75. PubMed ID: 28324769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparison.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Feb; 247():54-61. PubMed ID: 25553355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
    Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do latent fingerprint examiners differ in their conclusions?
    Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Ausdemore M; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Nov; 316():110542. PubMed ID: 33147525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e32800. PubMed ID: 22427888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interexaminer variation of minutia markup on latent fingerprints.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():89-99. PubMed ID: 27046517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts.
    Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of fatigue on latent print examinations as revealed by behavioral and eye gaze testing.
    Busey T; Swofford HJ; Vanderkolk J; Emerick B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jun; 251():202-8. PubMed ID: 25918906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilizing AFIS searching tools to reduce errors in fingerprint casework.
    Langenburg G; Hall C; Rosemarie Q
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():123-133. PubMed ID: 26295930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.
    Dror IE; Charlton D; Péron AE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jan; 156(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 16325362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination.
    Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How time pressure and fingerprint complexity affect fingerprint examiner performance in an Eye Tracking Study.
    Zou J; Liu S; Sun Q; Wang C; Liu Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Nov; 328():111007. PubMed ID: 34592579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Utility of Expanded Conclusion Scales During Latent Print Examinations.
    Carter KE; Vogelsang MD; Vanderkolk J; Busey T
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1141-1154. PubMed ID: 32134513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forensic comparison and matching of fingerprints: using quantitative image measures for estimating error rates through understanding and predicting difficulty.
    Kellman PJ; Mnookin JL; Erlikhman G; Garrigan P; Ghose T; Mettler E; Charlton D; Dror IE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e94617. PubMed ID: 24788812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tracking the growth of visual evidence in fingerprint comparison tasks.
    Busey T; Emerick B; Vanderkolk J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jan; 85(1):244-260. PubMed ID: 36451077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of forensic footwear examiner decisions.
    Austin Hicklin R; McVicker BC; Parks C; LeMay J; Richetelli N; Smith M; Buscaglia J; Perlman RS; Peters EM; Eckenrode BA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Oct; 339():111418. PubMed ID: 35987091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.