These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34029944)

  • 1. Design, evaluation, and optimization of 3D printed truss scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
    Shirzad M; Zolfagharian A; Matbouei A; Bodaghi M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Aug; 120():104594. PubMed ID: 34029944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrating finite element modelling and 3D printing to engineer biomimetic polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering.
    Schipani R; Nolan DR; Lally C; Kelly DJ
    Connect Tissue Res; 2020 Mar; 61(2):174-189. PubMed ID: 31495233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fabrication of scalable tissue engineering scaffolds with dual-pore microarchitecture by combining 3D printing and particle leaching.
    Mohanty S; Sanger K; Heiskanen A; Trifol J; Szabo P; Dufva M; Emnéus J; Wolff A
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Apr; 61():180-9. PubMed ID: 26838839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D-printed poly(Ɛ-caprolactone) scaffold with gradient mechanical properties according to force distribution in the mandible for mandibular bone tissue engineering.
    Zamani Y; Amoabediny G; Mohammadi J; Seddiqi H; Helder MN; Zandieh-Doulabi B; Klein-Nulend J; Koolstra JH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Apr; 104():103638. PubMed ID: 32174396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fabrication and
    Tang X; Qin Y; Xu X; Guo D; Ye W; Wu W; Li R
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():2076138. PubMed ID: 31815125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair.
    Zhang L; Yang G; Johnson BN; Jia X
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Jan; 84():16-33. PubMed ID: 30481607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element evaluations of the mechanical properties of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffolds by direct ink writing: Effects of pore geometry.
    Zhang B; Guo L; Chen H; Ventikos Y; Narayan RJ; Huang J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Apr; 104():103665. PubMed ID: 32174423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preparation and characterization of PLA/PCL/HA composite scaffolds using indirect 3D printing for bone tissue engineering.
    Hassanajili S; Karami-Pour A; Oryan A; Talaei-Khozani T
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Nov; 104():109960. PubMed ID: 31500051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-objective Shape Optimization of Bone Scaffolds: Enhancement of Mechanical Properties and Permeability.
    Foroughi AH; Razavi MJ
    Acta Biomater; 2022 Jul; 146():317-340. PubMed ID: 35533924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Permeability and mechanical properties of gradient porous PDMS scaffolds fabricated by 3D-printed sacrificial templates designed with minimal surfaces.
    Montazerian H; Mohamed MGA; Montazeri MM; Kheiri S; Milani AS; Kim K; Hoorfar M
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 96():149-160. PubMed ID: 31252172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Dimensional Printing of Biodegradable Piperazine-Based Polyurethane-Urea Scaffolds with Enhanced Osteogenesis for Bone Regeneration.
    Ma Y; Hu N; Liu J; Zhai X; Wu M; Hu C; Li L; Lai Y; Pan H; Lu WW; Zhang X; Luo Y; Ruan C
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 Mar; 11(9):9415-9424. PubMed ID: 30698946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quasi-static and dynamic in vitro mechanical response of 3D printed scaffolds with tailored pore size and architectures.
    Rotbaum Y; Puiu C; Rittel D; Domingos M
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Mar; 96():176-182. PubMed ID: 30606523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The first systematic analysis of 3D rapid prototyped poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds manufactured through BioCell printing: the effect of pore size and geometry on compressive mechanical behaviour and in vitro hMSC viability.
    Domingos M; Intranuovo F; Russo T; De Santis R; Gloria A; Ambrosio L; Ciurana J; Bartolo P
    Biofabrication; 2013 Dec; 5(4):045004. PubMed ID: 24192056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preparation of 3D printed calcium sulfate filled PLA scaffolds with improved mechanical and degradation properties.
    Ansari MAA; Jain PK; Nanda HS
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2023 Aug; 34(10):1408-1429. PubMed ID: 36628582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterisation of the surface structure of 3D printed scaffolds for cell infiltration and surgical suturing.
    Ruiz-Cantu L; Gleadall A; Faris C; Segal J; Shakesheff K; Yang J
    Biofabrication; 2016 Mar; 8(1):015016. PubMed ID: 26930179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indirect selective laser sintering-printed microporous biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold promotes endogenous bone regeneration via activation of ERK1/2 signaling.
    Zeng H; Pathak JL; Shi Y; Ran J; Liang L; Yan Q; Wu T; Fan Q; Li M; Bai Y
    Biofabrication; 2020 Mar; 12(2):025032. PubMed ID: 32084655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D printed scaffold design for bone defects with improved mechanical and biological properties.
    Fallah A; Altunbek M; Bartolo P; Cooper G; Weightman A; Blunn G; Koc B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Oct; 134():105418. PubMed ID: 36007489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [CYTOCOMPATIBILITY AND PREPARATION OF BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD BY COMBINING LOW TEMPERATURE THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING AND VACUUM FREEZE-DRYING TECHNIQUES].
    Li D; Zhang Z; Zheng C; Zhao B; Sun K; Nian Z; Zhang X; Li R; Li H
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 30(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 27281872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structure-function assessment of 3D-printed porous scaffolds by a low-cost/open source fused filament fabrication printer.
    Vallejos Baier R; Contreras Raggio JI; Toro Arancibia C; Bustamante M; Pérez L; Burda I; Aiyangar A; Vivanco JF
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Apr; 123():111945. PubMed ID: 33812577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review on the use of computational methods to characterize, design, and optimize tissue engineering scaffolds, with a potential in 3D printing fabrication.
    Zhang S; Vijayavenkataraman S; Lu WF; Fuh JYH
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2019 Jul; 107(5):1329-1351. PubMed ID: 30300964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.