These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3403167)

  • 1. Level of uncertainty and brain damage: a reaction time test of attention for clinical use.
    Wyns C; Bruyer R
    Int J Neurosci; 1988 Jun; 40(3-4):153-65. PubMed ID: 3403167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for age-related changes to temporal attention and memory from the choice time production task.
    Gooch CM; Stern Y; Rakitin BC
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009 May; 16(3):285-310. PubMed ID: 19132578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.
    Ansorge U; Wühr P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modulation of the spatial attention network by incentives in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment.
    Bagurdes LA; Mesulam MM; Gitelman DR; Weintraub S; Small DM
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2943-8. PubMed ID: 18602410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of age, brain damage, and task complexity on the sensitivity of reaction time to the delay between the warning signal and the stimulus.
    Bruyer R; Coyette F; Wyns C
    Int J Neurosci; 1989 Nov; 49(1-2):87-93. PubMed ID: 2606609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Specific abnormalities in serotonin release in the prefrontal cortex of isolation-reared rats measured during behavioural performance of a task assessing visuospatial attention and impulsivity.
    Dalley JW; Theobald DE; Pereira EA; Li PM; Robbins TW
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Nov; 164(3):329-40. PubMed ID: 12424557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Error-related negativity in a visual go/no-go task: children vs. adults.
    Kim EY; Iwaki N; Imashioya H; Uno H; Fujita T
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2007; 31(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 17488215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of spatial and nonspatial memory tasks on choice stepping reaction time in older people.
    Sturnieks DL; St George R; Fitzpatrick RC; Lord SR
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1063-8. PubMed ID: 18948556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).
    Puffe L; Dittrich K; Klauer KC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184844. PubMed ID: 28910413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Divided attention and mental effort after severe traumatic brain injury.
    Azouvi P; Couillet J; Leclercq M; Martin Y; Asloun S; Rousseaux M
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(9):1260-8. PubMed ID: 15178177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time discrimination in traumatic brain injury patients.
    Mioni G; Stablum F; Cantagallo A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2013; 35(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 23259647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An interfering Go/No-go task does not affect accuracy in a Concealed Information Test.
    Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Apr; 68(1):6-16. PubMed ID: 18180065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving time discrimination in children and adults in a temporal bisection task: the effects of feedback and no forced choice on decision and memory processes.
    Droit-Volet S; Izaute M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1173-88. PubMed ID: 19034811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aging and working memory inside and outside the focus of attention: dissociations of availability and accessibility.
    Vaughan L; Basak C; Hartman M; Verhaeghen P
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 Nov; 15(6):703-24. PubMed ID: 18608047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus ambiguity elicits response conflict.
    Szmalec A; Verbruggen F; Vandierendonck A; De Baene W; Verguts T; Notebaert W
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 18329807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial attention in the mental architecture: evidence from neuropsychology.
    Behrmann M; Black SE; Murji S
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Apr; 17(2):220-42. PubMed ID: 7629269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Free testosterone levels, attentional control, and processing speed performance in aging men.
    Martin DM; Burns NR; Wittert G
    Neuropsychology; 2009 Mar; 23(2):158-67. PubMed ID: 19254089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.