These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34031739)

  • 1. Validation of the IWATE criteria as a laparoscopic liver resection difficulty score in a single North American cohort.
    Barron JO; Orabi D; Moro A; Quintini C; Berber E; Aucejo FN; Sasaki K; Kwon CD
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3601-3609. PubMed ID: 34031739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Lin H; Bai Y; Yin M; Chen Z; Yu S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3732-3749. PubMed ID: 34406470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of complexity and complications of laparoscopic liver surgery: The comparison of the Halls-score to the IWATE-score in 100 consecutive laparoscopic liver resections.
    Tripke V; Huber T; Mittler J; Lang H; Heinrich S
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2020 Jul; 27(7):380-387. PubMed ID: 32162482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation and performance of three-level procedure-based classification for laparoscopic liver resection.
    Kawaguchi Y; Tanaka S; Fuks D; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Kubo S; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G; Gayet B
    Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2056-2066. PubMed ID: 31338665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A machine learning analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic liver surgery.
    Ruzzenente A; Bagante F; Poletto E; Campagnaro T; Conci S; De Bellis M; Pedrazzani C; Guglielmi A
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):8869-8880. PubMed ID: 35604481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Based on the IWATE criteria: to investigate the influence of different surgical approaches on the perioperative outcomes of hepatectomy.
    Xie F; Ge J; Sheng W; Wang D; Liao W; Li E; Wu L; Lei J
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1044-1052. PubMed ID: 36109356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of IWATE laparoscopic difficulty score on postoperative outcomes and costs for robotic hepatectomy: Are complex resections more expensive?
    Sucandy I; Vasanthakumar P; Ross SB; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; App S; Rosemurgy A
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2024 Jul; 31(7):446-454. PubMed ID: 38800881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of IWATE, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, and Southampton Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Scoring Systems for Predicting Intra and Postoperative Outcomes in Robotic Hepatectomy.
    Sucandy I; Ross SB; Adorno Flores J; Syblis C; Pattilachan TM; Christodoulou M; Rosemurgy A
    Am Surg; 2024 Jul; 90(7):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 38520138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resection type is a predictor of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial liver resection.
    Tanemura A; Mizuno S; Maeda K; Shinkai T; Ito T; Hayasaki A; Gyoten K; Fujii T; Iizawa Y; Murata Y; Kuriyama N; Kishiwada M; Sakurai H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9054-9063. PubMed ID: 35831677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution and trends in the adoption of laparoscopic liver resection in Singapore: Analysis of 300 cases.
    Goh BK; Wang Z; Koh YX; Lim KI
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2021 Oct; 50(10):742-750. PubMed ID: 34755168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. IWATE criteria are associated with perioperative outcomes in robotic hepatectomy: a retrospective review of 225 resections.
    Labadie KP; Droullard DJ; Lois AW; Daniel SK; McNevin KE; Gonzalez JV; Seo YD; Sullivan KM; Bilodeau KS; Dickerson LK; Utria AF; Calhoun J; Pillarisetty VG; Sham JG; Yeung RS; Park JO
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):889-895. PubMed ID: 33608766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utility of the Iwate difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: do surgical outcomes differ for tumors in segments VI and VII?
    Choi SH; Chen KH; Syn NL; Cipriani F; Cheung TT; Chiow AKH; Choi GH; Siow TF; Sucandy I; Marino MV; Gastaca M; Chong CC; Lee JH; Ivanecz A; Mazzaferro V; Lopez-Ben S; Fondevila C; Rotellar F; Campos RR; Efanov M; Kingham TP; Sutcliffe RP; Troisi RI; Pratschke J; Wang X; D'Hondt M; Yong CC; Levi Sandri GB; Tang CN; Ruzzenente A; Cherqui D; Ferrero A; Wakabayashi G; Scatton O; Aghayan D; Edwin B; Coelho FF; Giuliante F; Liu R; Sijberden J; Abu Hilal M; Sugioka A; Long TCD; Fuks D; Aldrighetti L; Han HS; Goh BKP;
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9204-9214. PubMed ID: 35851819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors of unplanned intraoperative conversion to hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery or open surgery in laparoscopic liver resection.
    Masuda T; Endo Y; Amano S; Kawamura M; Fujinaga A; Nakanuma H; Kawasaki T; Kawano Y; Hirashita T; Iwashita Y; Ohta M; Inomata M
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Aug; 407(5):1961-1969. PubMed ID: 35249169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.
    Tanaka S; Kawaguchi Y; Kubo S; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaibori M; Kojima T; Otsuka Y; Fuks D; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N; Kaneko H; Gayet B; Wakabayashi G
    Surgery; 2019 Apr; 165(4):731-740. PubMed ID: 30446171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study between standard and learning curve CUSUM.
    Sultana A; Nightingale P; Marudanayagam R; Sutcliffe RP
    HPB (Oxford); 2019 Nov; 21(11):1505-1512. PubMed ID: 30992198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.
    Ivanecz A; Plahuta I; Magdalenić T; Mencinger M; Peruš I; Potrč S; Krebs B
    BMC Surg; 2019 Nov; 19(1):179. PubMed ID: 31775813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The preoperative M2BPGi score predicts operative difficulty and the incidence of postoperative complications in laparoscopic liver resection.
    Fuji T; Kojima T; Kajioka H; Sakamoto M; Oka R; Katayama T; Narahara Y; Niguma T
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1262-1273. PubMed ID: 36175698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic liver resection: initial experience in a North-African single center.
    Benkabbou A; Souadka A; Serji B; Hachim H; El Malki HO; Mohsine R; Ifrine L; Belkouchi A
    Tunis Med; 2015; 93(8-9):523-6. PubMed ID: 26815517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic liver resection for huge (≥10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: A coarsened exact-matched single-surgeon study.
    Kabir T; Syn NL; Guo Y; Lim KI; Goh BKP
    Surg Oncol; 2021 Jun; 37():101569. PubMed ID: 33839442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The difficulty grade of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with long-term outcomes.
    Lv X; Zhang L; Yu X; Yu H
    Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):881-888. PubMed ID: 36773170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.