These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34031739)
21. Comparison of clinical outcome between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy of high difficulty score for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis. Ng KKC; Cheng KC; Kung JWC; Ho KM; Lok HT; Fung AKY; Chong CCN; Cheung SYS; Lee KF; Wong J; Lai PBS Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):857-871. PubMed ID: 38082015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validity of the Iwate criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive liver resection. Krenzien F; Wabitsch S; Haber P; Kamali C; Brunnbauer P; Benzing C; Atanasov G; Wakabayashi G; Öllinger R; Pratschke J; Schmelzle M J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2018 Sep; 25(9):403-411. PubMed ID: 30076767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Match-Pair Analysis of Open Versus Laparoscopic Liver Surgery. Heinrich S; Tripke V; Huber T; Mittler J; Lang H JSLS; 2017; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 29326529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Critical appraisal of the learning curve of minimally invasive hepatectomy: experience with the first 200 cases of a Southeast Asian early adopter. Goh BKP; Prieto M; Syn N; Koh YX; Lim KI ANZ J Surg; 2020 Jun; 90(6):1092-1098. PubMed ID: 31957149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Applying IWATE criteria to robotic hepatectomy: is there a "robotic effect"? Luberice K; Sucandy I; Modasi A; Castro M; Krill E; Ross S; Rosemurgy A HPB (Oxford); 2021 Jun; 23(6):899-906. PubMed ID: 33144052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of a Difficulty Scoring System for Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Multicenter Analysis by the Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group in Japan. Tanaka S; Kubo S; Kanazawa A; Takeda Y; Hirokawa F; Nitta H; Nakajima T; Kaizu T; Kaneko H; Wakabayashi G J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Aug; 225(2):249-258.e1. PubMed ID: 28408311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pure laparoscopic versus robotic liver resections: Multicentric propensity score-based analysis with stratification according to difficulty scores. Cipriani F; Fiorentini G; Magistri P; Fontani A; Menonna F; Annecchiarico M; Lauterio A; De Carlis L; Coratti A; Boggi U; Ceccarelli G; Di Benedetto F; Aldrighetti L J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1108-1123. PubMed ID: 34291591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Lesions Adjacent to Major Vessels: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. Xu HW; Li HY; Liu F; Wei YG; Li B J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Oct; 27(10):1002-1008. PubMed ID: 28850285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Laparoscopic liver resection for liver tumours in proximity to major vasculature: A single-center comparative study. D'Hondt M; Willems E; Parmentier I; Pottel H; De Meyere C; Vansteenkiste F; Besselink MG; Verslype C Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):539-547. PubMed ID: 31668978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Results of robotic liver surgery in association with IWATE criteria - the first 100 cases. Steinkraus KC; Traub B; Heger P; Zaimi M; Mihaljevic AL; Michalski CW; Kornmann M; Hüttner FJ Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Feb; 409(1):50. PubMed ID: 38305912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical Practicality Study of the Difficulty Scoring Systems DSS-B and DSS-ER in Laparoscopic Liver Resection. Yang J; Yang Z; Jia G; Xi Y; Xu Y; Li P; Han B; Hu X; Sun C J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jan; 29(1):12-18. PubMed ID: 30036137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validation of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection in hepatolithiasis. Kim J; Cho JY; Han HS; Yoon YS; Choi Y; Lee JS; Lee B; Kim J Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 32152674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the Iwate Model for Predicting the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Does Tumor Size Matter? Ivanecz A; Plahuta I; Magdalenić T; Ilijevec B; Mencinger M; Peruš I; Potrč S J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Jun; 25(6):1451-1460. PubMed ID: 32495139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Systematic review and meta-analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic and robotic liver resections. Linn YL; Wu AG; Han HS; Liu R; Chen KH; Fuks D; Soubrane O; Cherqui D; Geller D; Cheung TT; Edwin B; Aldrighetti L; Abu Hilal M; Troisi RI; Wakabayashi G; Goh BKP; J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2023 Jan; 30(1):36-59. PubMed ID: 35780493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Benign Tumors and Lesions: A Case Matched Study with Propensity Score Matching. Wabitsch S; Kästner A; Haber PK; Benzing C; Krenzien F; Andreou A; Kamali C; Lenz K; Pratschke J; Schmelzle M J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Dec; 29(12):1518-1525. PubMed ID: 31670608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. External validation of the Japanese difficulty score for laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients undergoing robotic-assisted hepatectomy. Ricker AB; Davis JM; Motz BM; Watson M; Beckman M; Driedger M; Martinie JB; Vrochides D Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7288-7294. PubMed ID: 37558825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Critical appraisal of predictive tools to assess the difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review. Hallet J; Pessaux P; Beyfuss KA; Jayaraman S; Serrano PE; Martel G; Coburn NG; Piardi T; Mahar AL Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30350105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Laparoscopic versus open limited liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study with the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO). Yamamoto M; Kobayashi T; Oshita A; Abe T; Kohashi T; Onoe T; Fukuda S; Omori I; Imaoka Y; Honmyo N; Ohdan H Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5055-5061. PubMed ID: 31828498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Major Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Based on Surgeons' Learning Curve. Navarro JG; Kang I; Rho SY; Choi GH; Han DH; Kim KS; Choi JS Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):447-458. PubMed ID: 32602059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]