BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34031743)

  • 1. Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers.
    Sylla P; Sagar P; Johnston SS; Dwarakanathan HR; Waggoner JR; Schwiers M; Roy S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2541-2553. PubMed ID: 34031743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indirect comparison between powered and manual circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomoses: clinical and economic outcomes in China.
    Bai J; Zhao Y; Liang H; Li J; Zhang C
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2022 Aug; 20(1):45. PubMed ID: 36045434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic Analysis of Leak Complications in Anastomoses Performed with Powered versus Manual Circular Staplers in Left-Sided Colorectal Resections: A US-Based Cost Analysis.
    Pollack E; Johnston S; Petraiuolo WJ; Roy S; Galvain T
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2021; 13():531-540. PubMed ID: 34168470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
    Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
    Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
    BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Initial clinical experience with a powered circular stapler for colorectal anastomosis.
    Atallah S; Kural S; Banda N; Banda A; Bawaney F; Cabral F; Neychev V; Patel C; Larach S
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 May; 24(5):479-486. PubMed ID: 32193667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidence, predictors, and economic burden of circular anastomotic complications in left-sided colorectal reconstructions involving manual circular staplers.
    Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Chaudhuri R; Fryrear R; Roy S
    J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):255-265. PubMed ID: 33576292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
    Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of a circular powered stapler for creation of anastomosis in left-sided colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study.
    Herzig DO; Ogilvie JW; Chudzinski A; Ferrara A; Ashraf SQ; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Van der Speeten K; Kinross J; Schimmelpenning H; Sagar PM; Cannon JA; Schwiers ML; Singleton DW; Waggoner JR; Fryrear R; Sylla P
    Int J Surg; 2020 Dec; 84():140-146. PubMed ID: 33176211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of a circular powered stapler on preventing anastomotic leakage in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.
    Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Kitayama K; Maeda K
    BMC Surg; 2023 Jul; 23(1):205. PubMed ID: 37464350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.
    Vanstraelen S; Coosemans W; Depypere L; Mandeville Y; Moons J; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 36222069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M;
    Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the impact of EEA stapler size on risk of anastomotic complications in colorectal anastomosis: does size matter?
    Reif de Paula T; Simon H; Shah M; Lee-Kong S; Kiely JM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Apr; 24(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 32036461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of circular stapler size on anastomotic stricture formation in colorectal surgery: A propensity score matched study.
    Lee KY; Lee J; Park YY; Kim HJ; Oh ST
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287595. PubMed ID: 37903104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of a new triple-row circular stapler in reducing the risk of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A historical control and propensity score-matched study.
    Mazaki J; Katsumata K; Ishizaki T; Fukushima N; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Kuwabara H; Enomoto M; Nagakawa Y; Tsuchida A
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jul; 101(27):e29325. PubMed ID: 35801763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of economic and clinical outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery with powered versus manual endoscopic surgical staplers.
    Roy S; Yoo A; Yadalam S; Fegelman EJ; Kalsekar I; Johnston SS
    J Med Econ; 2017 Apr; 20(4):423-433. PubMed ID: 28270023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.
    Nagaoka T; Yamaguchi T; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Nagayama S; Fukunaga Y; Chino A; Ishizuka N; Konishi T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Aug; 64(8):937-945. PubMed ID: 33951685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
    J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.