317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34031840)
1. A multi-stage fuzzy decision-making framework to evaluate the appropriate wastewater treatment system: a case study.
Büyüközkan G; Tüfekçi G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53507-53519. PubMed ID: 34031840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel fuzzy framework for technology selection of sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on TODIM methodology in developing urban areas.
Eseoglu G; Yapsakli K; Tozan H; Vayvay O
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8800. PubMed ID: 35614159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A fuzzy multi-objective optimization approach for treated wastewater allocation.
Tayebikhorami S; Nikoo MR; Sadegh M
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jun; 191(7):468. PubMed ID: 31243555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of fuzzy multi-criteria approach to prioritize locations of treated wastewater use considering climate change scenarios.
Chung ES; Kim Y
J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():505-516. PubMed ID: 25218330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A PROMETHEE based outranking approach for the construction of Fangcang shelter hospital using spherical fuzzy sets.
Akram M; Zahid K; Kahraman C
Artif Intell Med; 2023 Jan; 135():102456. PubMed ID: 36628791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An integrated fuzzy approach for strategic alliance partner selection in third-party logistics.
Erkayman B; Gundogar E; Yilmaz A
ScientificWorldJournal; 2012; 2012():486306. PubMed ID: 23365520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-criteria decision support framework for sustainable implementation of effective green supply chain management practices.
Boutkhoum O; Hanine M; Boukhriss H; Agouti T; Tikniouine A
Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):664. PubMed ID: 27350904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An integrated decision making approach for selecting a sustainable waste water treatment technology.
Narayanamoorthy S; Brainy JV; Sulaiman R; Ferrara M; Ahmadian A; Kang D
Chemosphere; 2022 Aug; 301():134568. PubMed ID: 35439483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hazardous Waste Disposal Enterprise Selection in China Using Hesitant Fuzzy PROMETHEE.
Liang X; Miao J; Li Y; Yang X; Li Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 32560196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Group Decision Making Framework Based on Neutrosophic TOPSIS Approach for Smart Medical Device Selection.
Abdel-Basset M; Manogaran G; Gamal A; Smarandache F
J Med Syst; 2019 Jan; 43(2):38. PubMed ID: 30627801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An experimental comparison of fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process for medical decision support systems.
Uzoka FM; Obot O; Barker K; Osuji J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jul; 103(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 20633949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery.
Hancerliogullari G; Hancerliogullari KO; Koksalmis E
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28114944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new web-based framework development for fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making.
Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
Springerplus; 2016; 5():601. PubMed ID: 27247897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applying analytical decision methods for determination of the best treatment alternative to remove emerging micropollutants from drinking water and wastewater: triclosan example.
Ozturk E
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Oct; 25(30):30517-30546. PubMed ID: 30171528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of the new easy approach to fuzzy multi-criteria decision aid in the field of management.
Ziemba P
MethodsX; 2021; 8():101344. PubMed ID: 34430248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Framework to Prioritize the Public Expectations from Water Treatment Plants based on Trapezoidal Type-2 Fuzzy Ahp Method.
Yildiz A; Ayyildiz E; Taskin Gumus A; Ozkan C
Environ Manage; 2021 Mar; 67(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 32990792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel two-phase group decision-making model for circular supplier selection under picture fuzzy environment.
Kaya SK
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(12):34135-34157. PubMed ID: 36508096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
