358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34032342)
41. Distinct mitotic segregation errors mediate chromosomal instability in aggressive urothelial cancers.
Jin Y; Stewénius Y; Lindgren D; Frigyesi A; Calcagnile O; Jonson T; Edqvist A; Larsson N; Lundberg LM; Chebil G; Liedberg F; Gudjonsson S; Månsson W; Höglund M; Gisselsson D
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Mar; 13(6):1703-12. PubMed ID: 17363523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Chromosomal instability and cancer: a complex relationship with therapeutic potential.
Bakhoum SF; Compton DA
J Clin Invest; 2012 Apr; 122(4):1138-43. PubMed ID: 22466654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Spatiotemporal dynamics of Aurora B-PLK1-MCAK signaling axis orchestrates kinetochore bi-orientation and faithful chromosome segregation.
Shao H; Huang Y; Zhang L; Yuan K; Chu Y; Dou Z; Jin C; Garcia-Barrio M; Liu X; Yao X
Sci Rep; 2015 Jul; 5():12204. PubMed ID: 26206521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. CENP-A overexpression promotes aneuploidy with karyotypic heterogeneity.
Shrestha RL; Rossi A; Wangsa D; Hogan AK; Zaldana KS; Suva E; Chung YJ; Sanders CL; Difilippantonio S; Karpova TS; Karim B; Foltz DR; Fachinetti D; Aplan PD; Ried T; Basrai MA
J Cell Biol; 2021 Apr; 220(4):. PubMed ID: 33620383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prevention and correction mechanisms behind anaphase synchrony: implications for the genesis of aneuploidy.
Matos I; Maiato H
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 133(2-4):243-53. PubMed ID: 21304244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability.
Burrell RA; McClelland SE; Endesfelder D; Groth P; Weller MC; Shaikh N; Domingo E; Kanu N; Dewhurst SM; Gronroos E; Chew SK; Rowan AJ; Schenk A; Sheffer M; Howell M; Kschischo M; Behrens A; Helleday T; Bartek J; Tomlinson IP; Swanton C
Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7438):492-496. PubMed ID: 23446422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Misaligned Chromosomes are a Major Source of Chromosomal Instability in Breast Cancer.
Tucker JB; Bonema SC; García-Varela R; Denu RA; Hu Y; McGregor SM; Burkard ME; Weaver BA
Cancer Res Commun; 2023 Jan; 3(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 36968230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The spindle checkpoint and chromosome segregation in meiosis.
Gorbsky GJ
FEBS J; 2015 Jul; 282(13):2471-87. PubMed ID: 25470754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The Opposing Functions of Protein Kinases and Phosphatases in Chromosome Bipolar Attachment.
Sherwin D; Wang Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 31817904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The kinetochore and cancer: what's the connection?
Yuen KW; Montpetit B; Hieter P
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2005 Dec; 17(6):576-82. PubMed ID: 16233975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Aurora kinase B dependent phosphorylation of 53BP1 is required for resolving merotelic kinetochore-microtubule attachment errors during mitosis.
Wang H; Peng B; Pandita RK; Engler DA; Matsunami RK; Xu X; Hegde PM; Butler BE; Pandita TK; Mitra S; Xu B; Hegde ML
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(30):48671-48687. PubMed ID: 28415769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint.
Hauf S; Cole RW; LaTerra S; Zimmer C; Schnapp G; Walter R; Heckel A; van Meel J; Rieder CL; Peters JM
J Cell Biol; 2003 Apr; 161(2):281-94. PubMed ID: 12707311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Recruitment of separase to mitotic chromosomes is regulated by Aurora B.
Yuan K; Li N; Huo Y; Yan F; Yang Y; Ward T; Jin C; Yao X
Cell Cycle; 2009 May; 8(9):1433-43. PubMed ID: 19342897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Deregulation of the centrosome cycle and the origin of chromosomal instability in cancer.
Lingle WL; Lukasiewicz K; Salisbury JL
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2005; 570():393-421. PubMed ID: 18727509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Chromosomal Instability in Tumor Initiation and Development.
Bach DH; Zhang W; Sood AK
Cancer Res; 2019 Aug; 79(16):3995-4002. PubMed ID: 31350294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Living in CIN: Mitotic Infidelity and Its Consequences for Tumor Promotion and Suppression.
Funk LC; Zasadil LM; Weaver BA
Dev Cell; 2016 Dec; 39(6):638-652. PubMed ID: 27997823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Small-molecule inhibition of aging-associated chromosomal instability delays cellular senescence.
Barroso-Vilares M; Macedo JC; Reis M; Warren JD; Compton D; Logarinho E
EMBO Rep; 2020 May; 21(5):e49248. PubMed ID: 32134180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. CIN and Aneuploidy: Different Concepts, Different Consequences.
Schukken KM; Foijer F
Bioessays; 2018 Jan; 40(1):. PubMed ID: 29160563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Preventing aneuploidy: the contribution of mitotic checkpoint proteins.
Suijkerbuijk SJ; Kops GJ
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2008 Sep; 1786(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 18472014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Whole chromosome instability and cancer: a complex relationship.
Ricke RM; van Ree JH; van Deursen JM
Trends Genet; 2008 Sep; 24(9):457-66. PubMed ID: 18675487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
