BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34032476)

  • 1. Eye Movements Predict Large-Scale Voting Decisions.
    Coronel JC; Bullock OM; Shulman HC; Sweitzer MD; Bond RM; Poulsen S
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jun; 32(6):836-848. PubMed ID: 34032476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The voting experience and beliefs about ballot secrecy.
    Dowling CM; Doherty D; Hill SJ; Gerber AS; Huber GA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209765. PubMed ID: 30615669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study.
    Tang OY; Wong KE; Ganguli R; Zahiri K; Burns NM; Paracha S; Kozel G; Tang KP; Schuur JD
    West J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 22(4):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35354012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forensic analysis of Turkish elections in 2017-2018.
    Klimek P; Jiménez R; Hidalgo M; Hinteregger A; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204975. PubMed ID: 30289899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Tsai CH; Yen NS; Chen AL; Lin WC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148643. PubMed ID: 26886266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.
    Raccuia L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163872. PubMed ID: 27732617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When endocrinology and democracy collide: emotions, cortisol and voting at national elections.
    Waismel-Manor I; Ifergane G; Cohen H
    Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2011 Nov; 21(11):789-95. PubMed ID: 21482457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emergency Mail-in Voting in Rhode Island: Protecting Civic Participation During COVID-19 and Beyond.
    Burns NM; Zahiri K; Ganguli R; Kozel G; Paracha S; Tang KP; Tang OY; Wong KE
    R I Med J (2013); 2020 Oct; 103(8):14-17. PubMed ID: 33003675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To Brexit or not to Brexit: The roles of Islamophobia, conspiracist beliefs, and integrated threat in voting intentions for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum.
    Swami V; Barron D; Weis L; Furnham A
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Feb; 109(1):156-179. PubMed ID: 28632335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Human Factors Can Help Preserve Democracy in the Age of Pandemics.
    Kortum P; Stein R; Acemyan CZ; Wallach DS; Vann E
    Hum Factors; 2020 Nov; 62(7):1077-1086. PubMed ID: 32741224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A sociocultural approach to voting: Construing voting as a duty to others predicts political interest and engagement.
    Waldfogel HB; Dittmann AG; Birnbaum HJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(22):e2215051121. PubMed ID: 38768346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Explaining voting in the UK's 2016 EU referendum: Values, attitudes to immigration, European identity and political trust.
    Dennison J; Davidov E; Seddig D
    Soc Sci Res; 2020 Nov; 92():102476. PubMed ID: 33172565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weekly Fluctuations in Risk Tolerance and Voting Behaviour.
    Sanders JG; Jenkins R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159017. PubMed ID: 27392020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hostile and harmful: Structural stigma and minority stress explain increased anxiety among migrants living in the United Kingdom after the Brexit referendum.
    Frost DM
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2020 Jan; 88(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 31647276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?
    Friese M; Smith CT; Plischke T; Bluemke M; Nosek BA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e44130. PubMed ID: 22952898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Voting at 16: Turnout and the quality of vote choice.
    Wagner M; Johann D; Kritzinger S
    Elect Stud; 2012 Jun; 31(2):372-383. PubMed ID: 24850994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blockchain for Electronic Voting System-Review and Open Research Challenges.
    Jafar U; Aziz MJA; Shukur Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 34502764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. America's electorate is increasingly polarized along partisan lines about voting by mail during the COVID-19 crisis.
    Lockhart M; Hill SJ; Merolla J; Romero M; Kousser T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Oct; 117(40):24640-24642. PubMed ID: 32963092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immigration, political trust, and Brexit - Testing an aversion amplification hypothesis.
    Abrams D; Travaglino GA
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2018 Apr; 57(2):310-326. PubMed ID: 29318624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.