451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34032510)
1. Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy: MRI-based Risk Models versus a PI-RADS and PSA Density Strategy for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Deniffel D; Healy GM; Dong X; Ghai S; Salinas-Miranda E; Fleshner N; Hamilton R; Kulkarni G; Toi A; van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Finelli A; Perlis N; Haider MA
Radiology; 2021 Aug; 300(2):369-379. PubMed ID: 34032510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using decision curve analysis to benchmark performance of a magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model for prostate cancer risk assessment.
Deniffel D; Abraham N; Namdar K; Dong X; Salinas E; Milot L; Khalvati F; Haider MA
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6867-6876. PubMed ID: 32591889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Avoiding unnecessary biopsy: the combination of PRIMARY score with prostate-specific antigen density for prostate biopsy decision.
Guo S; Zhang J; Wang Y; Jiao J; Li Z; Cui C; Chen J; Yang W; Ma S; Wu P; Jing Y; Wen W; Kang F; Wang J; Qin W
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2024 Jun; 27(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 38160227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk-Adapted Strategy Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density to Individualize Biopsy Decision in Patients With PI-RADS 3 ``Gray Zone'' Lesions.
Akpinar C; Oz DK; Oktar A; Suer E; Ozden E; Haliloglu N; Gulpinar O; Gokce MI; Gogus C; Baltaci S
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2024 Jun; 22(3):102071. PubMed ID: 38555682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).
Falagario UG; Jambor I; Lantz A; Ettala O; Stabile A; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Perez IM; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Picker W; Haug E; Ratnani P; Haines K; Lewis S; Sujit N; Selvaggio O; Sanguedolce F; Macarini L; Cormio L; Nordström T; Tewari A; Briganti A; Boström PJ; Carrieri G
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):971-979. PubMed ID: 32972896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI.
Girometti R; Giannarini G; Panebianco V; Maresca S; Cereser L; De Martino M; Pizzolitto S; Pecoraro M; Ficarra V; Zuiani C; Valotto C
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210886. PubMed ID: 34762506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Avoiding Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Biopsies: Negative and Positive Predictive Value of MRI According to Prostate-specific Antigen Density, 4Kscore and Risk Calculators.
Falagario UG; Martini A; Wajswol E; Treacy PJ; Ratnani P; Jambor I; Anastos H; Lewis S; Haines K; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Rastinehad AR; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):700-704. PubMed ID: 31548130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Clinical, and Biopsy Findings in Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Haj-Mirzaian A; Burk KS; Lacson R; Glazer DI; Saini S; Kibel AS; Khorasani R
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Mar; 7(3):e244258. PubMed ID: 38551559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category.
Morote J; Campistol M; Triquell M; Celma A; Regis L; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Mast R; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 37():38-44. PubMed ID: 35243388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate cancer risk calculators and decision strategies in two large European medical centres.
Davik P; Remmers S; Elschot M; Roobol MJ; Bathen TF; Bertilsson H
BJU Int; 2024 Mar; 133(3):278-288. PubMed ID: 37607322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?
Polanec SH; Bickel H; Wengert GJ; Arnoldner M; Clauser P; Susani M; Shariat SF; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e1-157.e7. PubMed ID: 31690449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy after Multiparametric Prostate MRI with VERDICT Analysis: The INNOVATE Study.
Singh S; Rogers H; Kanber B; Clemente J; Pye H; Johnston EW; Parry T; Grey A; Dinneen E; Shaw G; Heavey S; Stopka-Farooqui U; Haider A; Freeman A; Giganti F; Atkinson D; Moore CM; Whitaker HC; Alexander DC; Panagiotaki E; Punwani S
Radiology; 2022 Dec; 305(3):623-630. PubMed ID: 35916679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.
Araújo D; Gromicho A; Dias J; Bastos S; Maciel RM; Sabença A; Xambre L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):11830. PubMed ID: 38117217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone.
Niu XK; Li J; Das SK; Xiong Y; Yang CB; Peng T
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 28143433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of prostate volume estimation on the risk-adapted biopsy decision based on prostate-specific antigen density and magnetic resonance imaging score.
Baudewyns A; Guenzel K; Halinski A; Dariane C; Delavar G; Anract J; Barry Delongchamps N; Jabbour T; Bourgeno HA; Lefebvre Y; Ferriero M; Simone G; Fourcade A; Fournier G; Oderda M; Gontero P; Bernal-Gomez A; Mastrorosa A; Roche JB; Zahr RA; Ploussard G; Fiard G; Rysankova K; Bui AP; Taha F; Windisch O; Benamran D; Vlahopoulos L; Assenmacher G; Roumeguère T; Peltier A; Diamand R
World J Urol; 2024 May; 42(1):322. PubMed ID: 38747982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
