These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3403385)

  • 1. A new rapid component in the cochlear response to brief electrical efferent stimulation: CM and otoacoustic observations.
    Kemp DT; Souter M
    Hear Res; 1988 Jul; 34(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 3403385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel cholinergic "slow effect" of efferent stimulation on cochlear potentials in the guinea pig.
    Sridhar TS; Liberman MC; Brown MC; Sewell WF
    J Neurosci; 1995 May; 15(5 Pt 1):3667-78. PubMed ID: 7751937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diverse responses of single auditory afferent fibres to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus in guinea-pig.
    Mulders WH; Robertson D
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 15309356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variations of cochlear microphonic potential after sectioning efferent fibers to the cochlea.
    Bonfils P; Remond MC; Pujol R
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(2-3):267-71. PubMed ID: 3680069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferior colliculus stimulation causes similar efferent effects on ipsilateral and contralateral cochlear potentials in the guinea pig.
    Zhang W; Dolan DF
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 16500626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus at low rates protects the cochlea from auditory desensitization.
    Rajan R
    Brain Res; 1990 Jan; 506(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 1967964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of electrical pulse shape on AVCN unit responses to cochlear stimulation.
    Wiler JA; Clopton BM; Mikhail MA
    Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 39(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 2753830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. I. Intensity dependence of firing rate and response latency.
    Raggio MW; Schreiner CE
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Nov; 72(5):2334-59. PubMed ID: 7884463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses of medial olivocochlear neurons. Specifying the central pathways of the medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Brown MC; de Venecia RK; Guinan JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Dec; 153(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 14557911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.
    Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; Klis SF
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of intravenous injection of aspirin on the cochlea].
    Kumagai M
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1992 Mar; 67(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 1597302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efferent tracts and cochlear frequency selectivity.
    Bonfils P; Remond MC; Pujol R
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 3793643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correspondence between sharp tuning and two-tone inhibition in primary auditory neurones.
    Robertson D
    Nature; 1976 Feb; 259(5543):477-8. PubMed ID: 1256545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions.
    Hill JC; Prasher DK; Luxon LM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9199519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear efferent neurones and protection against acoustic trauma: protection of outer hair cell receptor current and interanimal variability.
    Patuzzi RB; Thompson ML
    Hear Res; 1991 Jul; 54(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 1917716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig: basic characteristics.
    Avan P; Loth D; Menguy C; Teyssou M
    Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 44(2-3):151-60. PubMed ID: 2329091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of section of the medial efferent tracts (crossed and uncrossed) on cochlear frequency selectivity.
    Bonfils P; Remond MC; Pujol R
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(3):285-7. PubMed ID: 3793644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics.
    Mountain DC
    Science; 1980 Oct; 210(4465):71-2. PubMed ID: 7414321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Function of the olivocochlear system.
    Pfalz KJ
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1973; 20():311-5. PubMed ID: 4710514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.