569 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34034421)
1. [Analysis of perioperative complications and influencing factors of complications in 1 000 cases of robotic gynecological surgery].
Huang XT; Ji M; Zhao Z; He NN; Li Y; Xu PL; Zhang JF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 May; 56(5):341-348. PubMed ID: 34034421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan.
Tan SJ; Lin CK; Fu PT; Liu YL; Sun CC; Chang CC; Yu MH; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 22482963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in the Gynecologic Oncology Setting.
Moukarzel LA; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 27815041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mini-Laparoscopy for Removal (Partial) of Adnexae at the Time of Hysterectomy.
Setúbal AG; Alves JS; Lavado O; Faria J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):201-202. PubMed ID: 27856389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.
Wechter ME; Mohd J; Magrina JF; Cornella JL; Magtibay PM; Wilson JR; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):844-50. PubMed ID: 24699301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Initial experience in the laparoscopic treatment of benign and malignant gynaecological diseases in the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad in Oaxaca].
Vásquez-Ciriaco S; Isla-Ortiz D; Palomeque-Lopez A; García-Espinoza JA; Jarquín-Arremilla A; Lechuga-García NA
Cir Cir; 2017; 85(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 27320647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. TELELAP ALF-X Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Feasibility and Perioperative Outcomes.
Fanfani F; Restaino S; Gueli Alletti S; Fagotti A; Monterossi G; Rossitto C; Costantini B; Scambia G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1011-7. PubMed ID: 25982854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes.
Casarin J; Multinu F; Tortorella L; Cappuccio S; Weaver AL; Ghezzi F; Cilby W; Kumar A; Langstraat C; Glaser G; Mariani A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 31780567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical analysis of 23 cases with simultaneous double primary gynecological malignant tumors].
He Y; Wang Y; Ji C; Liu Y; Wu YM
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 57(5):352-360. PubMed ID: 35658326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using a percutaneous surgical system: a pilot study towards scarless surgery.
Rossitto C; Gueli Alletti S; Rotolo S; Cianci S; Panico G; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():132-5. PubMed ID: 27289066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy.
Gomes MTV; Machado AMN; Podgaec S; Barison GAS
Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2017; 15(4):476-480. PubMed ID: 29364368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.
Anand M; Woelk JL; Weaver AL; Trabuco EC; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB
Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1193-200. PubMed ID: 24715099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of port-site metastases in pelvic cancers after robotic surgery.
Seror J; Bats AS; Bensaïd C; Douay-Hauser N; Ngo C; Lécuru F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):599-603. PubMed ID: 25624161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
