339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34034735)
1. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study.
Karkehabadi H; Siahvashi Z; Shokri A; Haji Hasani N
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 34034735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Shaping Ability of XP-endo Shaper and ProTaper Next in Large Root Canals.
Arıcan Öztürk B; Atav Ateş A; Fişekçioğlu E
J Endod; 2020 Mar; 46(3):437-443. PubMed ID: 31911004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Canal Transportation, Centering Ratio by Cone-beam Computed Tomography after Preparation with Different File Systems.
Uzunoglu E; Turker SA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):360-5. PubMed ID: 26162254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of Shaping Abilities of Rotary File Systems in Oval Canals with Moderate Root Curvature: A Randomized Controlled
Thomas AR; Reddy TVK; Tan JY; Qing SEJ; Qing CS; Xuan LY; Pai ARV
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Apr; 24(4):221-227. PubMed ID: 37469260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of Xp Shaper, WaveOne and Oneshape: a cone beam computed tomography study of curved root canals.
Hassan R; Roshdy N; Issa N
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2018 Jun; 31(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 30056469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Micro-computed Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of 5 Rotary and Reciprocating Systems with Different Metallurgical Properties and Surface Treatments in Curved Root Canals.
Kabil E; Katić M; Anić I; Bago I
J Endod; 2021 Mar; 47(3):477-484. PubMed ID: 33217469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation and Centering Ability in Curved Mesiobuccal Canals of Mandibular First Molars after Instrumentation with Different File Systems-An
Langaliya A; Kothari A; Buch A; Dave R; Shah J; Shah N
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2023 Jul; 15(Suppl 2):S1211-S1214. PubMed ID: 37694024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems.
Hasheminia SM; Farhad A; Sheikhi M; Soltani P; Hendi SS; Ahmadi M
J Endod; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1788-1791. PubMed ID: 30390970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Canal Transportation and Centering Ability in Long Oval Canals: A Multidimentional Analysis.
Nathani TI; Nathani AI; Pawar AM; Khakiani MI; Ruiz XF; Olivieri JG
J Endod; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1242-1247. PubMed ID: 31472950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The shaping ability of WaveOne Gold, TRUShape and XP-endo Shaper systems in oval-shaped distal canals of mandibular molars: A microcomputed tomographic analysis.
Poly A; Marques F; Moura Sassone L; Karabucak B
Int Endod J; 2021 Dec; 54(12):2300-2306. PubMed ID: 34473842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Canal transportation and centering ratio after preparation in severely curved canals: analysis by micro-computed tomography and double-digital radiography.
Poly A; AlMalki F; Marques F; Karabucak B
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4255-4262. PubMed ID: 30834991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
Liu Y; Chen M; Tang W; Liu C; Du M
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):649. PubMed ID: 36577985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of centralization ability and canal transportation of root canals prepared with three commercially available pediatric rotary files.
Reddy KH; Mukthineni S; Sai Sankar AJ; Samatha Y; Pranitha K; Sankar KS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(4):391-397. PubMed ID: 36861555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Centering Ability of ProTaper, Mtwo, WaveOne, and Reciproc Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography:
Remya M; Singh P; Varughese A; Joseph A; Chandran P; Subramanian D; Kumar SV
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):589-592. PubMed ID: 36259296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness of TRUShape and ProTaper Next systems in curved root canals using micro-computed tomography.
Elnaghy AM; Al-Dharrab AA; Abbas HM; Elsaka SE
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27669727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative Evaluation of Canal-shaping Abilities of RaceEvo, R-Motion, Reciproc Blue, and ProTaper Gold NiTi Rotary File Systems: A CBCT Study.
Mustafa M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Dec; 22(12):1406-1412. PubMed ID: 35656678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apical root canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Universal with and without PathFile.
Zanette F; Grazziotin-Soares R; Flores ME; Camargo Fontanella VR; Gavini G; Barletta FB
J Endod; 2014 May; 40(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 24767565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
