177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34034960)
1. Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft monthly contact lenses in neophyte wearers.
Wolffsohn JS; Ghorbani-Mojarrad N; Vianya-Estopa M; Nagra M; Huntjens B; Terry L; Sweeney LE; Dutta D; Joshi MR; Wright D; Bruce H; Hallam E; Jolly L; Chung YB; En Tsen JR; Bishop A; Davison R; Maldonado-Codina C;
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2022 Aug; 45(4):101469. PubMed ID: 34034960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast versus gradual adaptation of soft daily disposable contact lenses in neophyte wearers.
Wolffsohn JS; Dhirajlal H; Vianya-Estopa M; Nagra M; Madden L; Sweeney LE; Goodyear AS; Kerr LV; Terry L; Sheikh S; Murphy O; Lloyd A; Maldonado-Codina C;
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Jun; 43(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 31543407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear.
Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB; Efron N; Efron S
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):536-48. PubMed ID: 15976592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ocular physiology and comfort in neophyte subjects fitted with daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
Morgan PB; Chamberlain P; Moody K; Maldonado-Codina C
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Jun; 36(3):118-25. PubMed ID: 23279732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel.
Cheung SW; Cho P; Chan B; Choy C; Ng V
Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Mar; 90(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 17311574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 6-month follow-up of successful refits from daily disposable soft contact lenses to continuous wear of high-Dk silicone-hydrogel lenses.
Aakre BM; Ystenaes AE; Doughty MJ; Austrheim Ø; Westerfjell B; Lie MT
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Mar; 24(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 15005678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule.
Brennan NA; Coles ML; Comstock TL; Levy B
Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1172-7. PubMed ID: 12045062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crossover Evaluation of Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
Wolffsohn JS; Mroczkowska S; Hunt OA; Bilkhu P; Drew T; Sheppard A
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1063-8. PubMed ID: 26390350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers.
Best N; Drury L; Wolffsohn JS
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):232-7. PubMed ID: 23522993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meibomian glands structure in daily disposable soft contact lens wearers: a one-year follow-up study.
Llorens-Quintana C; Garaszczuk IK; Szczesna-Iskander DH
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Sep; 40(5):607-616. PubMed ID: 32716128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical performance of three silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses.
Varikooty J; Schulze MM; Dumbleton K; Keir N; Woods CA; Fonn D; Jones LW
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 25628269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Myopia progression during three years of soft contact lens wear.
Blacker A; Mitchell GL; Bullimore MA; Long B; Barr JT; Dillehay SM; Bergenske P; Donshik P; Secor G; Yoakum J; Chalmers RL
Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Oct; 86(10):1150-3. PubMed ID: 19741563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of comfort and tear stability with two novel silicone-hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses.
Mimura T; Noma H; Yamaguchi M; Shinbo K
Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Mar; 44(1):136. PubMed ID: 38485796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a).
Riley C; Young G; Chalmers R
Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Dec; 32(6):281-6. PubMed ID: 17099389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of tear osmolarity and ocular comfort between daily disposable contact lenses: hilafilcon B hydrogel versus narafilcon A silicone hydrogel.
Sarac O; Gurdal C; Bostancı-Ceran B; Can I
Int Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 32(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 22484700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical benefits of a new multipurpose disinfecting solution in silicone hydrogel and soft contact lens users.
Campbell R; Kame G; Leach N; Paul M; White E; Zigler L
Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Mar; 38(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 22297841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comfort and adaptation to silicone hydrogel lenses for daily wear.
Dumbleton KA; Woods CA; Jones LW; Fonn D
Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Jul; 34(4):215-23. PubMed ID: 18787429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Compatibility of two new silicone hydrogel contact lenses with three soft contact lens multipurpose solutions*.
Santodomingo-Rubido J; Barrado-Navascués E; Rubido-Crespo MJ; Sugimoto K; Sawano T
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):373-81. PubMed ID: 18565093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Refractive and biometric changes with silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
Santodomingo-Rubido J; Gilmartin B; Wolffsohn J
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):481-9. PubMed ID: 15976585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in ocular physiology, tear film characteristics, and symptomatology with 18 months silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
Santodomingo-Rubido J; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 16501408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
