These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34034992)

  • 41. The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention.
    Holmes P; Oppenheimer LW; Wen SW
    BJOG; 2001 Nov; 108(11):1120-4. PubMed ID: 11762649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.
    Zimmo MW; Laine K; Hassan S; Bottcher B; Fosse E; Ali-Masri H; Zimmo K; Sørum Falk R; Lieng M; Vikanes Å
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e022875. PubMed ID: 30361403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reporting Caesarean Delivery in Quebec Using the Robson Classification System.
    Roberge S; Dubé E; Blouin S; Chaillet N
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Mar; 39(3):152-156. PubMed ID: 28343556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital.
    Chong C; Su LL; Biswas A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1422-7. PubMed ID: 22897799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Induction of labour vs. spontaneous vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy after 36 weeks of gestation.
    Tavares MV; Domingues AP; Nunes F; Tavares M; Fonseca E; Moura P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 27925470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
    Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Risk of caesarean section after induced labour: do hospitals make a difference?
    Teixeira C; Correia S; Barros H
    BMC Res Notes; 2013 May; 6():214. PubMed ID: 23714240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial.
    Bernitz S; Dalbye R; Zhang J; Eggebø TM; Frøslie KF; Olsen IC; Blix E; Øian P
    Lancet; 2019 Jan; 393(10169):340-348. PubMed ID: 30581039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The outcomes of trial of labour after cesarean section following induction of labour compared to spontaneous labour.
    Al-Shaikh G; Al-Mandeel H
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1099-103. PubMed ID: 23307166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Induction of labour for postdates in nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancy - is the caesarean section rate really lower?
    Mahomed K; Pungsornruk K; Gibbons K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Oct; 36(7):916-920. PubMed ID: 27612522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Intravenous fluids for reducing the duration of labour in low risk nulliparous women.
    Dawood F; Dowswell T; Quenby S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; (6):CD007715. PubMed ID: 23780639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Trends in Indigenous and non-Indigenous caesarean section births in the Northern Territory of Australia, 1986-2012: a total population-based study.
    Thompson F; Dempsey K; Mishra G
    BJOG; 2016 Oct; 123(11):1814-23. PubMed ID: 26777399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Maternal and fetal characteristics for predicting risk of Cesarean section following induction of labor: pooled analysis of PROBAAT trials.
    Quach D; Ten Eikelder M; Jozwiak M; Davies-Tuck M; Bloemenkamp KWM; Mol BW; Li W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 59(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 34490668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.
    Kayani SI; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 15777443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Risks of induction of labour in women with a uterine scar from previous low transverse caesarean section.
    Locatelli A; Regalia AL; Ghidini A; Ciriello E; Biffi A; Pezzullo JC
    BJOG; 2004 Dec; 111(12):1394-9. PubMed ID: 15663125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.
    Jozwiak M; Dodd JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD009792. PubMed ID: 23543582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.
    Triunfo S; Ferrazzani S; Lanzone A; Scambia G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jun; 189():91-5. PubMed ID: 25898370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Secular trends in caesarean section rates over 20 years in a regional obstetric unit in Hong Kong.
    Chung WH; Kong CW; To WW
    Hong Kong Med J; 2017 Aug; 23(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 28684651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women.
    Brown HC; Paranjothy S; Dowswell T; Thomas J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; (9):CD004907. PubMed ID: 24043476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term--no advantage of delaying induction for 24 hours.
    Akyol D; Mungan T; Unsal A; Yüksel K
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 39(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 10554936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.