These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3403501)

  • 21. Perceptual correlates of successful body-prosthesis interaction in lower limb amputees: psychometric characterisation and development of the Prosthesis Embodiment Scale.
    Bekrater-Bodmann R
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):14203. PubMed ID: 32848166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Being like everybody else: the personal meanings of being a prosthesis user.
    Murray CD
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(7):573-81. PubMed ID: 19034778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of myoelectric and conventional prostheses for adolescent amputees.
    Weaver SA; Lange LR; Vogts VM
    Am J Occup Ther; 1988 Feb; 42(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 3348341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preliminary assessment of three new designs of prosthetic prehensors for upper limb amputees.
    Meeks D; LeBlanc M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1988 Apr; 12(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 3399368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. My prosthesis as a part of me: a qualitative analysis of living with an osseointegrated prosthetic limb.
    Lundberg M; Hagberg K; Bullington J
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 21697203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of environmental and personal factors on participation of lower-limb prosthetic users in low-income countries: prosthetists' perspectives.
    Kam S; Kent M; Khodaverdian A; Daiter L; Njelesani J; Cameron D; Andrysek J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2015 May; 10(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 24694038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life.
    Østlie K; Lesjø IM; Franklin RJ; Garfelt B; Skjeldal OH; Magnus P
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Nov; 7(6):479-93. PubMed ID: 22315926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Factors affecting quality of life in lower limb amputees.
    Sinha R; van den Heuvel WJ; Arokiasamy P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Mar; 35(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 21515894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Psychological adjustment and coping in adults with prosthetic limbs.
    Gallagher P; MacLachlan M
    Behav Med; 1999; 25(3):117-24. PubMed ID: 10640225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating a written emotional disclosure homework intervention for lower-limb amputees.
    Gallagher P; Maclachlan M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Oct; 83(10):1464-6. PubMed ID: 12370888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada.
    Kyberd PJ; Hill W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21697204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Management of the upper-limb-deficient child with a powered prosthetic device.
    Glynn MK; Galway HR; Hunter G; Sauter WF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Aug; (209):202-5. PubMed ID: 3731596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using the common sense self-regulation model to determine psychological predictors of prosthetic use and activity limitations in lower limb amputees.
    Callaghan B; Condie E; Johnston M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):324-36. PubMed ID: 18825576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Left and right hand recognition in upper limb amputees.
    Nico D; Daprati E; Rigal F; Parsons L; Sirigu A
    Brain; 2004 Jan; 127(Pt 1):120-32. PubMed ID: 14607796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scales (TAPES) in lower limb amputees.
    Topuz S; Ülger Ö; Yakut Y; Gül Şener F
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 21697202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Remote fitting procedures for upper limb 3d printed prostheses.
    Zuniga JM; Young KJ; Peck JL; Srivastava R; Pierce JE; Dudley DR; Salazar DA; Bergmann J
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2019 Mar; 16(3):257-266. PubMed ID: 30661413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Traumatic amputation of the upper limb: the use of body-powered prostheses and employment consequences.
    Stürup J; Thyregod HC; Jensen JS; Retpen JB; Boberg G; Rasmussen E; Jensen S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1988 Apr; 12(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 3399370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Suction socket suspension for below-knee amputees.
    Roberts RA
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1986 Mar; 67(3):196-9. PubMed ID: 3954583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Silicone roll-on suspension for upper limb prostheses: users' views.
    Gaber TA; Gardner CM; Kirker SG
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2001 Aug; 25(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 11573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.