BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34035140)

  • 1. Evidence and Urgency Related EEG Signals during Dynamic Decision-Making in Humans.
    Yau Y; Hinault T; Taylor M; Cisek P; Fellows LK; Dagher A
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(26):5711-5722. PubMed ID: 34035140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural Correlates of Evidence and Urgency During Human Perceptual Decision-Making in Dynamically Changing Conditions.
    Yau Y; Dadar M; Taylor M; Zeighami Y; Fellows LK; Cisek P; Dagher A
    Cereb Cortex; 2020 Sep; 30(10):5471-5483. PubMed ID: 32500144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decreasing Alertness Modulates Perceptual Decision-Making.
    Jagannathan SR; Bareham CA; Bekinschtein TA
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(3):454-473. PubMed ID: 34815316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual Motion and Decision-Making in Dyslexia: Reduced Accumulation of Sensory Evidence and Related Neural Dynamics.
    Manning C; Hassall CD; Hunt LT; Norcia AM; Wagenmakers EJ; Snowling MJ; Scerif G; Evans NJ
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(1):121-134. PubMed ID: 34782439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Centroparietal activity mirrors the decision variable when tracking biased and time-varying sensory evidence.
    Kohl C; Spieser L; Forster B; Bestmann S; Yarrow K
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Nov; 122():101321. PubMed ID: 32592971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expectations Do Not Alter Early Sensory Processing during Perceptual Decision-Making.
    Rungratsameetaweemana N; Itthipuripat S; Salazar A; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(24):5632-5648. PubMed ID: 29773755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abstract and Effector-Selective Decision Signals Exhibit Qualitatively Distinct Dynamics before Delayed Perceptual Reports.
    Twomey DM; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 36(28):7346-52. PubMed ID: 27413146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of urgency in decision making based on dynamic information.
    Ferrucci L; Genovesio A; Marcos E
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Oct; 17(10):e1009455. PubMed ID: 34606494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments.
    Ruesseler M; Weber LA; Marshall TR; O'Reilly J; Hunt LT
    Elife; 2023 Oct; 12():. PubMed ID: 37883173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural Encoding of Active Multi-Sensing Enhances Perceptual Decision-Making via a Synergistic Cross-Modal Interaction.
    Delis I; Ince RAA; Sajda P; Wang Q
    J Neurosci; 2022 Mar; 42(11):2344-2355. PubMed ID: 35091504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neurodynamic Evidence Supports a Forced-Excursion Model of Decision-Making under Speed/Accuracy Instructions.
    Spieser L; Kohl C; Forster B; Bestmann S; Yarrow K
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 29951578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Striatal activation reflects urgency in perceptual decision making.
    van Maanen L; Fontanesi L; Hawkins GE; Forstmann BU
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():294-303. PubMed ID: 27355435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early evidence affects later decisions: why evidence accumulation is required to explain response time data.
    Winkel J; Keuken MC; van Maanen L; Wagenmakers EJ; Forstmann BU
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):777-84. PubMed ID: 24395093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.
    Itthipuripat S; Cha K; Deering S; Salazar AM; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(40):8635-8649. PubMed ID: 30143576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confluence of Timing and Reward Biases in Perceptual Decision-Making Dynamics.
    Shinn M; Ehrlich DB; Lee D; Murray JD; Seo H
    J Neurosci; 2020 Sep; 40(38):7326-7342. PubMed ID: 32839233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accumulation of continuously time-varying sensory evidence constrains neural and behavioral responses in human collision threat detection.
    Markkula G; Uludağ Z; Wilkie RM; Billington J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009096. PubMed ID: 34264935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation of neural activity with behavioral kinematics reveals distinct sensory encoding and evidence accumulation processes during active tactile sensing.
    Delis I; Dmochowski JP; Sajda P; Wang Q
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():12-21. PubMed ID: 29580968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying cross-modal associations and their influence on perceptual decisions.
    Bolam J; Boyle SC; Ince RAA; Delis I
    Neuroimage; 2022 Feb; 247():118841. PubMed ID: 34952232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The latency of a visual evoked potential tracks the onset of decision making.
    Nunez MD; Gosai A; Vandekerckhove J; Srinivasan R
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():93-108. PubMed ID: 31028925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision threshold modulation in the human brain.
    Domenech P; Dreher JC
    J Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 30(43):14305-17. PubMed ID: 20980586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.