These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34035672)

  • 1. Enamel Surface Damage following Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: A Hospital-Based Study.
    Bora N; Mahanta P; Kalita D; Deka S; Konwar R; Phukan C
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2021; 2021():5561040. PubMed ID: 34035672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.
    Grzech-Leśniak K; Matys J; Żmuda-Stawowiak D; Mroczka K; Dominiak M; Brugnera Junior A; Gruber R; Romanos GE; Sculean A
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):595-600. PubMed ID: 29905504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation.
    Pont HB; Özcan M; Bagis B; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):387.e1-387.e9. PubMed ID: 20889035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of two laser motion modes versus conventional orthodontic ceramic brackets debonding technique on enamel surface topography.
    Abdulaziz A; El-Kholy MM; Bushra SS; Ali SM; Shehab KA
    Lasers Med Sci; 2024 Jun; 39(1):156. PubMed ID: 38869676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The extent of enamel surface fractures. A quantitative comparison of thermally debonded ceramic and mechanically debonded metal brackets by energy dispersive micro- and image-analysis.
    Stratmann U; Schaarschmidt K; Wegener H; Ehmer U
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):655-62. PubMed ID: 9009430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does ultra-pulse CO(2) laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets?
    Ahrari F; Heravi F; Fekrazad R; Farzanegan F; Nakhaei S
    Lasers Med Sci; 2012 May; 27(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 21667137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
    Amditis C
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of enamel on debonded orthodontic brackets.
    Cochrane NJ; Lo TWG; Adams GG; Schneider PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Sep; 152(3):312-319. PubMed ID: 28863911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
    Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system.
    Ghaleb L; Al-Worafi NA; Thawaba A; Abdulqader AA; Alkamel A; Abdo Y; Yang Z; Noman N; Al-Aroomi MA; Yulou T
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):358. PubMed ID: 38509532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Diode Laser Debonding of Ceramic Brackets on Enamel Surface and Pulpal Temperature.
    Yassaei S; Soleimanian A; Nik ZE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 26067728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of bracket removal on enamel.
    Heravi F; Rashed R; Raziee L
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19113075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scanning electron microscopic examination of Enamel surface after fixed orthodontic treatment: in-vivo study.
    Sessa T; Civović J; Pajević T; Juloski J; Beloica M; Pavlović V; Glisić B
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2012; 140(1-2):22-8. PubMed ID: 22462343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
    Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks.
    Bishara SE; Fonseca JM; Boyer DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7661139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 9267223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques.
    Khader MA; Dileep S; Gafoor A A; Mj J; Sunil M; Krishnaraj P
    J Orthod Sci; 2022; 11():16. PubMed ID: 35754420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.