These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34036707)

  • 1. Community structure and collapses in multichannel food webs: Role of consumer body sizes and mesohabitat productivities.
    Dijoux S; Boukal DS
    Ecol Lett; 2021 Aug; 24(8):1607-1618. PubMed ID: 34036707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the effects of trophic complexity on a keystone predator by disassembling a partial intraguild predation food web.
    Davenport JM; Chalcraft DR
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):242-50. PubMed ID: 21950407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraguild predation promotes complex alternative states along a productivity gradient.
    Takimoto G; Miki T; Kagami M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Sep; 72(2):264-73. PubMed ID: 17573086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bistability and an Allee effect as emergent consequences of stage-specific predation.
    van Kooten T; de Roos AM; Persson L
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Nov; 237(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 15935390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Energy limitation or sensitive predators? Trophic and non-trophic impacts of wastewater pollution on stream food webs.
    Mor JR; Muñoz I; Sabater S; Zamora L; Ruhi A
    Ecology; 2022 Feb; 103(2):e03587. PubMed ID: 34792187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Potential for Alternative Stable States in Food Webs Depends on Feedback Mechanism and Trait Diversity.
    Karatayev VA; Baskett ML; van Nes EH
    Am Nat; 2023 Sep; 202(3):260-275. PubMed ID: 37606941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A size-constrained feeding-niche model distinguishes predation patterns between aquatic and terrestrial food webs.
    Li J; Luo M; Wang S; Gauzens B; Hirt MR; Rosenbaum B; Brose U
    Ecol Lett; 2023 Jan; 26(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 36331162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does abundance scale with body size in coupled size-structured food webs?
    Blanchard JL; Jennings S; Law R; Castle MD; McCloghrie P; Rochet MJ; Benoît E
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jan; 78(1):270-80. PubMed ID: 19120607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phenotypic variation explains food web structural patterns.
    Gibert JP; DeLong JP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(42):11187-11192. PubMed ID: 28973955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling size structured food webs using a modified niche model with two predator traits.
    Klecka J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e99355. PubMed ID: 25119999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Herbivore population suppression by an intermediate predator, Phytoseiulus macropilis, is insensitive to the presence of an intraguild predator: an advantage of small body size?
    Rosenheim JA; Limburg DD; Colfer RG; Fournier V; Hsu CL; Leonardo TE; Nelson EH
    Oecologia; 2004 Aug; 140(4):577-85. PubMed ID: 15278424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Asymmetric foraging lowers the trophic level and omnivory in natural food webs.
    Zheng J; Brose U; Gravel D; Gauzens B; Luo M; Wang S
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Jun; 90(6):1444-1454. PubMed ID: 33666227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disturbance-mediated consumer assemblages determine fish community structure and moderate top-down influences through bottom-up constraints.
    Jellyman PG; McIntosh AR
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 May; 89(5):1175-1189. PubMed ID: 31856307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs.
    Brose U; Jonsson T; Berlow EL; Warren P; Banasek-Richter C; Bersier LF; Blanchard JL; Brey T; Carpenter SR; Blandenier MF; Cushing L; Dawah HA; Dell T; Edwards F; Harper-Smith S; Jacob U; Ledger ME; Martinez ND; Memmott J; Mintenbeck K; Pinnegar JK; Rall BC; Rayner TS; Reuman DC; Ruess L; Ulrich W; Williams RJ; Woodward G; Cohen JE
    Ecology; 2006 Oct; 87(10):2411-7. PubMed ID: 17089649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactive effects of body-size structure and adaptive foraging on food-web stability.
    Heckmann L; Drossel B; Brose U; Guill C
    Ecol Lett; 2012 Mar; 15(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 22276597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trophic Position of Consumers and Size Structure of Food Webs across Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems.
    Potapov AM; Brose U; Scheu S; Tiunov AV
    Am Nat; 2019 Dec; 194(6):823-839. PubMed ID: 31738104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predators with multiple ontogenetic niche shifts have limited potential for population growth and top-down control of their prey.
    van Leeuwen A; Huss M; Gårdmark A; Casini M; Vitale F; Hjelm J; Persson L; de Roos AM
    Am Nat; 2013 Jul; 182(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 23778226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Size-based ecological interactions drive food web responses to climate warming.
    Lindmark M; Ohlberger J; Huss M; Gårdmark A
    Ecol Lett; 2019 May; 22(5):778-786. PubMed ID: 30816635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The body size dependence of trophic cascades.
    DeLong JP; Gilbert B; Shurin JB; Savage VM; Barton BT; Clements CF; Dell AI; Greig HS; Harley CD; Kratina P; McCann KS; Tunney TD; Vasseur DA; O'Connor MI
    Am Nat; 2015 Mar; 185(3):354-66. PubMed ID: 25674690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predation risk influences food-web structure by constraining species diet choice.
    Ho HC; Tylianakis JM; Zheng JX; Pawar S
    Ecol Lett; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1734-1745. PubMed ID: 31389145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.