BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34037285)

  • 1. Multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography for elasticity quantitation and optimal tissue discrimination: A two-platform liver fibrosis mimicking phantom study.
    Andoh F; Yue JL; Julea F; Tardieu M; Noûs C; Pagé G; Garteiser P; Van Beers BE; Maitre X; Pellot-Barakat C
    NMR Biomed; 2021 Aug; 34(8):e4543. PubMed ID: 34037285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative Analysis of a Locally Resampling MR Elastography Reconstruction Algorithm in Liver Fibrosis.
    Pagé G; Julea F; Paradis V; Vilgrain V; Valla D; Van Beers BE; Garteiser P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Aug; 58(2):403-414. PubMed ID: 36448664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precision and Test-Retest Repeatability of Stiffness Measurement with MR Elastography: A Multicenter Phantom Study.
    Ozkaya E; Kennedy P; Chen J; Bane O; Dillman JR; Jhaveri KS; Ohliger MA; Rossman PJ; Tkach JA; Doucette JT; Venkatesh SK; Ehman RL; Taouli B
    Radiology; 2024 May; 311(2):e233136. PubMed ID: 38742971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acquisition and reconstruction conditions in silico for accurate and precise magnetic resonance elastography.
    Yue JL; Tardieu M; Julea F; Boucneau T; Sinkus R; Pellot-Barakat C; Maître X
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(22):8655-8670. PubMed ID: 28980977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Harmonic wideband simultaneous dual-frequency MR Elastography.
    Sango Solanas P; Tse Ve Koon K; Ratiney H; Millioz F; Caussy C; Beuf O
    NMR Biomed; 2021 Feb; 34(2):e4442. PubMed ID: 33179393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing liver fibrosis distribution through liver elasticity estimates obtained using a biomechanical model of respiratory motion with magnetic resonance elastography.
    Fujimoto K; Shiinoki T; Yuasa Y; Kawazoe Y; Yamane M; Sera T; Tanaka H
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jul; 67(15):. PubMed ID: 35767984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability of shear wave elastography in liver fibrosis phantoms-Evaluation of five different systems.
    Mulabecirovic A; Mjelle AB; Gilja OH; Vesterhus M; Havre RF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0189671. PubMed ID: 29293527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 2D Shear Wave Elastography, Transient Elastography, and MR Elastography for the Diagnosis of Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Furlan A; Tublin ME; Yu L; Chopra KB; Lippello A; Behari J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):W20-W26. PubMed ID: 31714842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiological Society of North America/Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance Shear Wave Speed Bias Quantification in Elastic and Viscoelastic Phantoms.
    Palmeri ML; Milkowski A; Barr R; Carson P; Couade M; Chen J; Chen S; Dhyani M; Ehman R; Garra B; Gee A; Guenette G; Hah Z; Lynch T; Macdonald M; Managuli R; Miette V; Nightingale KR; Obuchowski N; Rouze NC; Morris DC; Fielding S; Deng Y; Chan D; Choudhury K; Yang S; Samir AE; Shamdasani V; Urban M; Wear K; Xie H; Ozturk A; Qiang B; Song P; McAleavey S; Rosenzweig S; Wang M; Okamura Y; McLaughlin G; Chen Y; Napolitano D; Carlson L; Erpelding T; Hall TJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2021 Mar; 40(3):569-581. PubMed ID: 33410183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a phantom mimicking the functional and structural behaviors of the thigh muscles characterized with magnetic resonance elastography technique.
    Chakouch MK; Charleux F; Bensamoun SF
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():6736-9. PubMed ID: 26737839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification process based on shear wave propagation within a phantom using finite element modelling and magnetic resonance elastography.
    Leclerc GE; Charleux F; Ho Ba Tho MC; Bensamoun SF
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 23947476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of inversion methods in MR elastography: An open-access pipeline for processing multifrequency shear-wave data and demonstration in a phantom, human kidneys, and brain.
    Meyer T; Marticorena Garcia S; Tzschätzsch H; Herthum H; Shahryari M; Stencel L; Braun J; Kalra P; Kolipaka A; Sack I
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Oct; 88(4):1840-1850. PubMed ID: 35691940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis.
    Lefebvre T; Wartelle-Bladou C; Wong P; Sebastiani G; Giard JM; Castel H; Murphy-Lavallée J; Olivié D; Ilinca A; Sylvestre MP; Gilbert G; Gao ZH; Nguyen BN; Cloutier G; Tang A
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6477-6488. PubMed ID: 31278577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Elastography with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography for Pre-operative Staging of Hepatic Fibrosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Chou CT; Chen RC; Wu WP; Lin PY; Chen YL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 43(12):2783-2790. PubMed ID: 28965721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of quantitative shear wave MR-elastography with mechanical compression tests.
    Hamhaber U; Grieshaber FA; Nagel JH; Klose U
    Magn Reson Med; 2003 Jan; 49(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 12509821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supersonic transient magnetic resonance elastography for quantitative assessment of tissue elasticity.
    Liu Y; Liu J; Fite BZ; Foiret J; Ilovitsh A; Leach JK; Dumont E; Caskey CF; Ferrara KW
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4083-4106. PubMed ID: 28426437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: reproducibility of the examination and reproducibility and repeatability of the liver stiffness value measurement.
    Lee Yj; Lee JM; Lee JE; Lee KB; Lee ES; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Baek JH; Shin CI; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 23589232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of frequency- and direction-dependent elastic materials on linearly elastic MRE image reconstructions.
    Perreard IM; Pattison AJ; Doyley M; McGarry MD; Barani Z; Van Houten EE; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(22):6801-15. PubMed ID: 21030746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External vibration multi-directional ultrasound shearwave elastography (EVMUSE): application in liver fibrosis staging.
    Zhao H; Song P; Meixner DD; Kinnick RR; Callstrom MR; Sanchez W; Urban MW; Manduca A; Greenleaf JF; Chen S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Nov; 33(11):2140-8. PubMed ID: 25020066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime.
    Okamoto RJ; Clayton EH; Bayly PV
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6379-400. PubMed ID: 21908903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.