BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34037533)

  • 1. Backscatter factors calculation for intraoral dental radiology.
    Paixão L; Oliveira BB; Vieira LA
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 May; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 34037533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The Difference in Backscatter Factors of Diagnostic X-rays by the Difference in the Scattering Medium and in the Objective Dose].
    Kato H; Sakai K; Uchiyama M; Suzuki K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016; 72(10):1007-1014. PubMed ID: 27760900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of backscatter factors based on the quality index for diagnostic kilovoltage x-ray beams.
    Tanabe R; Araki F
    Phys Med; 2020 Sep; 77():48-53. PubMed ID: 32784116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-time estimation of surface dose based on incident air kerma in diagnostic radiology.
    Tanabe R; Araki F
    Phys Med; 2021 Sep; 89():176-181. PubMed ID: 34388557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measured and Monte Carlo simulated surface dose reduction for superficial X-rays incident on tissue with underlying air or bone.
    Baines J; Zawlodzka S; Markwell T; Chan M
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):926-933. PubMed ID: 29235131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of distant scatterer on air kerma measurement in the evaluation of diagnostic X-rays using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Tominaga M; Nagayasu Y; Sasaki M; Furuta T; Hayashi H; Oita M; Nishiyama Y; Haga A
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2021 Dec; 14(4):381-389. PubMed ID: 34716568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation of entrance surface dose calculations for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo simulations and radiotherapy dosimetry formalisms.
    Omrane LB; Verhaegen F; Chahed N; Mtimet S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 48(12):1809-24. PubMed ID: 12870585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Backscatter factors and mass energy-absorption coefficient ratios for diagnostic radiology dosimetry.
    Benmakhlouf H; Bouchard H; Fransson A; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 56(22):7179-204. PubMed ID: 22024474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Analysis of Scattered Radiation in an Irradiated Body by Means of the Monte Carlo Simulation: Back-scatter Factors of Diagnostic X-rays in the Incident Surface Which is Not Flat].
    Kato H; Minami K; Asada Y; Suzuki S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 May; 72(5):396-401. PubMed ID: 27211084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DENTAL INTRAORAL EXPOSURES IN PORTUGAL: FROM 1990 TO 2018.
    Trindade H; Coutinho G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):452-455. PubMed ID: 30916773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
    Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Energy-based Hp(3) measurement using solid-state detector.
    Ichikawa N; Matsubara K; Fukuda A; Hayashi T; Takamatsu K; Kuramoto T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 Jul; 199(11):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 37227144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. INTRAORAL DENTAL X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: STUDY FOR REVISING DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL VALUE.
    Praskalo J; Beganović A; Milanović J; Stanković K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):90-99. PubMed ID: 32744623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of backscatter factors in breast tomosynthesis using MCNPX simulations and measurements.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Figueira C; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):325-30. PubMed ID: 25836681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient radiation doses in intraoral and panoramic X-ray examinations in Sudan.
    Suliman II; Abdelgadir AH
    Phys Med; 2018 Feb; 46():148-152. PubMed ID: 29519401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Air kerma calculation in Monte Carlo simulations for deriving normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):N337-N349. PubMed ID: 28452342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Data for the dosimetry of low- and medium-energy kV x rays.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(20):205019. PubMed ID: 31491771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of calculations to validate beam quality and relative dose measurements for a kilovoltage X-ray therapy unit.
    Healy BJ; Hill RF
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Jun; 45(2):537-546. PubMed ID: 35381970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limiting values of backscatter factors for low-energy x-ray beams.
    Patrocinio HJ; Bissonnette JP; Bussière MR; Schreiner LJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Feb; 41(2):239-53. PubMed ID: 8746107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool.
    Brady SL; Kaufman RA
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2489-97. PubMed ID: 25979042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.