These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3403801)

  • 1. Adaptive staircase techniques in psychoacoustics: a comparison of human data and a mathematical model.
    Kollmeier B; Gilkey RH; Sieben UK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 May; 83(5):1852-62. PubMed ID: 3403801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of three adaptive psychophysical procedures using inexperienced listeners.
    Stillman JA
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Oct; 46(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 2798028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of maximum-likelihood threshold estimation with tone-in-noise masking.
    Baker RJ; Rosen S
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Feb; 35(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 11314910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple single-interval adaptive procedure for estimating thresholds in normal and impaired listeners.
    Lecluyse W; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2570-9. PubMed ID: 19894836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of adaptive procedures for rapid and reliable threshold assessment and training in naive listeners.
    Amitay S; Irwin A; Hawkey DJ; Cowan JA; Moore DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1616-25. PubMed ID: 16583906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision rules in detection of simple and complex tones.
    Buus S; Schorer E; Florentine M; Zwicker E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Dec; 80(6):1646-57. PubMed ID: 3794070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of threshold estimation methods in children 6-11 years of age.
    Buss E; Hall JW; Grose JH; Dev MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):727-31. PubMed ID: 11248976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymmetry of masking between noise and iterated rippled noise: evidence for time-interval processing in the auditory system.
    Krumbholz K; Patterson RD; Nobbe A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2096-107. PubMed ID: 11681387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-, three-, and four-interval forced-choice staircase procedures: estimator bias and efficiency.
    Schlauch RS; Rose RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):732-40. PubMed ID: 2212297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Logarithmic Versus Linear Change in Step Size When Using an Adaptive Threshold-Seeking Procedure in a Frequency Discrimination Task: Does It Matter?
    Zaltz Y; Roth DA; Amir N; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3887-3900. PubMed ID: 31618120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of auditory filter shapes derived with three different maskers.
    Glasberg BR; Moore BC; Nimmo-Smith I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):536-44. PubMed ID: 6699291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpreting the role of suppression in psychophysical tuning curves.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Nov; 72(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 7175021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A single-interval adjustment-matrix (SIAM) procedure for unbiased adaptive testing.
    Kaernbach C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Dec; 88(6):2645-55. PubMed ID: 2283438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spectral integration of broadband signals in diotic and dichotic masking experiments.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):317-26. PubMed ID: 1737880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cautionary note on the use of the adaptive up-down method.
    García-Pérez MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2098-107. PubMed ID: 21973364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A fast method for measuring psychophysical thresholds across the cochlear implant array.
    Bierer JA; Bierer SM; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    Trends Hear; 2015 Feb; 19():. PubMed ID: 25656797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of stop consonant identification using adaptive tracking procedures.
    Liu C; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL250-6. PubMed ID: 22979840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A measure for predicting audibility discrimination thresholds for spectral envelope distortions in vowel sounds.
    Rao P; van Dinther R; Veldhuis R; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2085-97. PubMed ID: 11386560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of frequency on free-field masking.
    Gilkey RH; Good MD
    Hum Factors; 1995 Dec; 37(4):835-43. PubMed ID: 8851779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.