169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3403890)
1. Comparisons of commercially available devices for the measurement of fixation disparity and associated phorias.
Brownlee GA; Goss DA
J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 3403890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of fixation disparity curve variables measured with the Sheedy Disparometer and the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card.
Goss DA; Patel J
Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):580-8. PubMed ID: 8539027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of fixation disparity curve with the modified near Mallett unit and the wesson fixation disparity card in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
Momeni-Moghaddam H; Yekta AA; Ehsani M; Kundart J
Strabismus; 2012 Dec; 20(4):166-74. PubMed ID: 23211142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of fixation disparity curve parameters obtained with the Wesson and Saladin fixation disparity cards.
Ngan J; Goss DA; Despirito J
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 15630407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of illumination and foveal fusion lock on clinical fixation disparity measurements with the Sheedy Disparometer.
Wildsoet CF; Cameron KD
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 4022649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fixation disparity measured by saladin card and disparometer.
Frantz KA; Elston P; Michalik E; Templeman CD; Zoltoski RK
Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 88(6):E733-41. PubMed ID: 21423065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the presence of a central fusion lock effect on fixation disparity curve parameters in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
Mirzaeian M; Hashemi H; Narooie-Noori F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Sardari S; Ostadimoghaddam H; Doostdar A; Khabazkhoob M
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Jul; 104(5):617-624. PubMed ID: 33751916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of Associated Phoria Tests.
Alhassan M; Hovis JK; Chou RB
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 92(8):900-7. PubMed ID: 26099058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement of Fixation Disparity Curve between Two Different Instruments.
Hashemi H; Mirzaeian M; Narooie F; Nabovati P; Yekta A; Ostadimoghaddam H; Sardari S; Khabazkhoob M
Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Jun; 98(6):629-635. PubMed ID: 34081653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of nearpoint techniques.
Yee L
J Am Optom Assoc; 1981 Jul; 52(7):579-82. PubMed ID: 7276417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Wesson and modified Sheedy fixation disparity tests. Do fixation disparity measures relate to normal binocular status?
van Haeringen R; McClurg P; Cameron KD
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(4):397-400. PubMed ID: 3627800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
Karania R; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of two fixation disparity targets.
Griffin JR; Shultz WE; Vansuch JJ
J Am Optom Assoc; 1978 Aug; 49(8):905-7. PubMed ID: 701715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of fixation disparity measurements obtained with the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card and the Sheedy Disparometer.
Dittemore D; Crum J; Kirschen D
Optom Vis Sci; 1993 May; 70(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 8515972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between fixation disparity curves and symptoms in monofixators.
London R; Wick B
J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Nov; 53(11):881-4. PubMed ID: 7175062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Actual measurement of fixation disparity and its use in diagnosis and treatment.
Sheedy JE
J Am Optom Assoc; 1980 Dec; 51(12):1079-84. PubMed ID: 7204818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurements of objective and subjective fixation disparity with and without a central fusion stimulus.
Brautaset RL; Jennings JA
Med Sci Monit; 2006 Feb; 12(2):MT1-4. PubMed ID: 16449958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Do prism corrections according to H.-J. Haase affect ocular prevalence?].
Schroth V; Jaschinski W
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 17260317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of vertical fixation disparities between essential hypertensives and matched normotensives.
Fancher RD; Roth N; Schuman DO; Shaffer SD; Schank J; Yolton RL
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Jul; 65(7):552-60. PubMed ID: 3207158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
