These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34039105)

  • 1. Anchoring and Judgment Bias: Disregarding Under Uncertainty.
    Berg SA; Moss JH
    Psychol Rep; 2022 Oct; 125(5):2688-2708. PubMed ID: 34039105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Academic judgments under uncertainty: A study of collective anchoring effects in Swedish Research Council panel groups.
    Roumbanis L
    Soc Stud Sci; 2017 Feb; 47(1):95-116. PubMed ID: 28195028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Heuristic reasoning and cognitive biases: Are they hindrances to judgments and decision making in orthodontics?
    Hicks EP; Kluemper GT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 21392683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When "bad" is good: How evaluative judgments eliminate the standard anchoring effect.
    Schweickart O; Tam C; Brown NR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32597668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.
    Lieder F; Griffiths TL; M Huys QJ; Goodman ND
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):322-349. PubMed ID: 28484952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heuristic decision-making across adulthood.
    Taylor MK; Marsh EJ; Samanez-Larkin GR
    Psychol Aging; 2023 Sep; 38(6):508-518. PubMed ID: 36757964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying Heuristic Bias: Anchoring, Availability, and Representativeness.
    Richie M; Josephson SA
    Teach Learn Med; 2018; 30(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 28753383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Noise Increases Anchoring Effects.
    Lee CY; Morewedge CK
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 33(1):60-75. PubMed ID: 34878951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience.
    Brainerd CJ; Reyna VF
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2001; 28():41-100. PubMed ID: 11605365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The anchor integration model: A descriptive model of anchoring effects.
    Turner BM; Schley DR
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Nov; 90():1-47. PubMed ID: 27567237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motivated Use of Numerical Anchors for Judgments Relevant to the Self.
    Joel S; Spielmann SS; MacDonald G
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jul; 43(7):972-985. PubMed ID: 28903703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unsafe sex: decision-making biases and heuristics.
    Kaplan BJ; Shayne VT
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1993; 5(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 8297709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of accuracy motivation and anchoring on metacomprehension judgment and accuracy.
    Zhao Q
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(3):155-74. PubMed ID: 24837018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing Analytical Reasoning in the Intensive Care Unit.
    Barash M; Nanchal RS
    Crit Care Clin; 2022 Jan; 38(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 34794631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heuristic decision-making in foster care matching: Evidence from a think-aloud study.
    Zeijlmans K; López López M; Grietens H; Knorth EJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 2019 Feb; 88():400-411. PubMed ID: 30590311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making.
    Ferreira MB; Garcia-Marques L; Sherman SJ; Sherman JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(5):797-813. PubMed ID: 17059302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anchoring effects on early autobiographical memories.
    Greenberg DL; Bishara AJ; Mugayar-Baldocchi MA
    Memory; 2017 Oct; 25(9):1303-1308. PubMed ID: 28276976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.
    Sanborn AN; Mansinghka VK; Griffiths TL
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Apr; 120(2):411-37. PubMed ID: 23458084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment.
    Jin M; Peng H; Wang D
    BMC Psychol; 2023 May; 11(1):158. PubMed ID: 37189205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Taking the high (or low) road: a quantifier priming perspective on basic anchoring effects.
    Sleeth-Keppler D
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(4):424-47. PubMed ID: 23951950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.