223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34039433)
1. Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.
Pham B; Jovanovic J; Bagheri E; Antony J; Ashoor H; Nguyen TT; Rios P; Robson R; Thomas SM; Watt J; Straus SE; Tricco AC
Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):156. PubMed ID: 34039433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aligning text mining and machine learning algorithms with best practices for study selection in systematic literature reviews.
Popoff E; Besada M; Jansen JP; Cope S; Kanters S
Syst Rev; 2020 Dec; 9(1):293. PubMed ID: 33308292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for in vitro systematic reviews: a comparison of screening methods and training of a machine learning classifier.
Wilson E; Cruz F; Maclean D; Ghanawi J; McCann SK; Brennan PM; Liao J; Sena ES; Macleod M
Clin Sci (Lond); 2023 Jan; 137(2):181-193. PubMed ID: 36630537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study.
Guo E; Gupta M; Deng J; Park YJ; Paget M; Naugler C
J Med Internet Res; 2024 Jan; 26():e48996. PubMed ID: 38214966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI: a user study.
Gartlehner G; Wagner G; Lux L; Affengruber L; Dobrescu A; Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Viswanathan M
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):277. PubMed ID: 31727159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses.
Schmidt L; Sinyor M; Webb RT; Marshall C; Knipe D; Eyles EC; John A; Gunnell D; Higgins JPT
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2023 Sep; 181():65-75. PubMed ID: 37596160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews.
Qin X; Liu J; Wang Y; Liu Y; Deng K; Ma Y; Zou K; Li L; Sun X
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():121-129. PubMed ID: 33485929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of text mining to reduce screening workload for injury-focused systematic reviews.
Giummarra MJ; Lau G; Gabbe BJ
Inj Prev; 2020 Feb; 26(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 31451565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Automated Literature Review Tool (LiteRev) for Streamlining and Accelerating Research Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning: Descriptive Performance Evaluation Study.
Orel E; Ciglenecki I; Thiabaud A; Temerev A; Calmy A; Keiser O; Merzouki A
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e39736. PubMed ID: 37713261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Natural language processing (NLP) to facilitate abstract review in medical research: the application of BioBERT to exploring the 20-year use of NLP in medical research.
Masoumi S; Amirkhani H; Sadeghian N; Shahraz S
Syst Rev; 2024 Apr; 13(1):107. PubMed ID: 38622611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers.
Rathbone J; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():80. PubMed ID: 26073974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decoding semi-automated title-abstract screening: findings from a convenience sample of reviews.
Gates A; Gates M; DaRosa D; Elliott SA; Pillay J; Rahman S; Vandermeer B; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):272. PubMed ID: 33243276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools.
Gates A; Guitard S; Pillay J; Elliott SA; Dyson MP; Newton AS; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):278. PubMed ID: 31727150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extractive text summarization system to aid data extraction from full text in systematic review development.
Bui DDA; Del Fiol G; Hurdle JF; Jonnalagadda S
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Dec; 64():265-272. PubMed ID: 27989816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can abstract screening workload be reduced using text mining? User experiences of the tool Rayyan.
Olofsson H; Brolund A; Hellberg C; Silverstein R; Stenström K; Österberg M; Dagerhamn J
Res Synth Methods; 2017 Sep; 8(3):275-280. PubMed ID: 28374510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the efficiency of study identification methods in systematic reviews.
Shemilt I; Khan N; Park S; Thomas J
Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 5(1):140. PubMed ID: 27535658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Semi-automating abstract screening with a natural language model pretrained on biomedical literature.
Ng SH; Teow KL; Ang GY; Tan WS; Hum A
Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 12(1):172. PubMed ID: 37740227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
