These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34039518)
1. Midwives must, obstetricians may: An ethnographic exploration of how policy documents organise intrapartum fetal monitoring practice. Small KA; Sidebotham M; Fenwick J; Gamble J Women Birth; 2022 Mar; 35(2):e188-e197. PubMed ID: 34039518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The social organisation of decision-making about intrapartum fetal monitoring: An Institutional Ethnography. Small KA; Sidebotham M; Fenwick J; Gamble J Women Birth; 2023 May; 36(3):281-289. PubMed ID: 36127282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "I'm not doing what I should be doing as a midwife": An ethnographic exploration of central fetal monitoring and perceptions of clinical safety. Small KA; Sidebotham M; Fenwick J; Gamble J Women Birth; 2022 Mar; 35(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 34092530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Midwives' and obstetricians' practice, perspectives and experiences in relation to altered fetal movement: A focused ethnographic study. Clark JA; Smith LK; Armstrong N Int J Nurs Stud; 2024 Feb; 150():104643. PubMed ID: 38043485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "My whole room went into chaos because of that thing in the corner": Unintended consequences of a central fetal monitoring system. Small K; Sidebotham M; Gamble J; Fenwick J Midwifery; 2021 Nov; 102():103074. PubMed ID: 34218022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wanting to be 'with woman', not with machine: Midwives' experiences of caring for women being continuously monitored in labour. Fox D; Coddington R; Scarf V Women Birth; 2022 Jul; 35(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 34556463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Midwives' and Medical professionals' perspectives of collaborative practice at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital Maternity Unit, Malawi: The discovery phase of an appreciative inquiry project. Chodzaza E; Mbiza C; Gadama L; Kafulafula U Malawi Med J; 2020 Mar; 32(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 32733654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "I didn't feel like I could trust her and that felt really risky": a phenomenographic exploration of how Australian Midwives describe intrapartum risk. Gabriel L; Reed R; Broadbent M; Hastie C Midwifery; 2023 Mar; 118():103582. PubMed ID: 36584609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to Foster Effective Midwife-Obstetrician Collaboration on Labor and Birth Units: Qualitative Analysis of Experiences of Clinicians in the United States. Adeyemo OO; Morelli EE; Kennedy HP J Midwifery Womens Health; 2022 Sep; 67(5):552-560. PubMed ID: 35754313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Collaboration of midwives in primary care midwifery practices with other maternity care providers. Warmelink JC; Wiegers TA; de Cock TP; Klomp T; Hutton EK Midwifery; 2017 Dec; 55():45-52. PubMed ID: 28926751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Practice, skills and experience with the Pinard stethoscope for intrapartum Foetal monitoring: Focus group interviews with Norwegian midwives. Engelhart CH; Nilsen ABV; Pay ASD; Maude R; Kaasen A; Blix E Midwifery; 2022 May; 108():103288. PubMed ID: 35240433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Midwives' perspectives of continuity based working in the UK: A cross-sectional survey. Taylor B; Cross-Sudworth F; Goodwin L; Kenyon S; MacArthur C Midwifery; 2019 Aug; 75():127-137. PubMed ID: 31100484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women's, midwives' and obstetricians' experiences of a structured process to document refusal of recommended maternity care. Jenkinson B; Kruske S; Stapleton H; Beckmann M; Reynolds M; Kildea S Women Birth; 2016 Dec; 29(6):531-541. PubMed ID: 27289330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How a perineal care bundle impacts midwifery practice in Australian maternity hospitals: A critical, reflexive thematic analysis. Allen J; Small K; Lee N Women Birth; 2022 Feb; 35(1):e1-e9. PubMed ID: 33485817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice. Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection and management of decreased fetal movements in Ireland: a national survey of midwives' and obstetricians' practices. Smith V; Begley C; Devane D Midwifery; 2014 Jan; 30(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23522665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The experiences of midwives in integrated maternity care: A qualitative metasynthesis. Kristienne McFarland A; Jones J; Luchsinger J; Kissler K; Smith DC Midwifery; 2020 Jan; 80():102544. PubMed ID: 31655307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Student midwives' perceptions on the organisation of maternity care and alternative maternity care models in the Netherlands - a qualitative study. Warmelink JC; de Cock TP; Combee Y; Rongen M; Wiegers TA; Hutton EK BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 28077073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midwives' action-guiding orientation while attending hospital births - A scoping review. Luegmair K; Ayerle GM; Steckelberg A Sex Reprod Healthc; 2022 Dec; 34():100778. PubMed ID: 36152453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vietnamese midwives' experiences of working in maternity care - A qualitative study in the Hanoi region. Holmlund S; Lan PT; Edvardsson K; Ntaganira J; Graner S; Small R; Mogren I Sex Reprod Healthc; 2022 Mar; 31():100695. PubMed ID: 35085930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]