115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34040686)
1. Much 'tattoo' about nothing; Tattoo pigment mimicking breast microcalcifications on mammography.
Heaney RM; Sweeney L; Smith C; O'Brien A
Radiol Case Rep; 2021 Jul; 16(7):1833-1835. PubMed ID: 34040686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factitious microcalcifications in breast biopsy material: laboratory-induced error by use of tattoo powder for specimen mammography.
Lager DJ; O'Connor JC; Robinson RA; Brown RC; Urdaneta LF
J Surg Oncol; 1989 Apr; 40(4):281-2. PubMed ID: 2927141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tattoo pigment mimicking axillary lymph node calcifications on mammography.
Paul Litton T; Vijay Ghate S
Radiol Case Rep; 2020 Aug; 15(8):1194-1196. PubMed ID: 32550957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tattoo Pigment in an Intramammary Lymph Node Mimicking Breast Malignancy.
Jung J; Peters G; Donovan S; Peters G
Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30336. PubMed ID: 36407269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of full-field digital mammograms versus 2D synthesized mammograms for detection of microcalcifications on screening.
Wahab RA; Lee SJ; Zhang B; Sobel L; Mahoney MC
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():14-19. PubMed ID: 30292258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know?
Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is There a Difference in the Diagnostic Outcomes of Calcifications Initially Identified on Synthetic Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening?
Zhu H; Polat D; Evans P; Mootz A; Blackburn T; Xi Y; Dogan BE
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Dec; 133():109365. PubMed ID: 33142193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary breast osteosarcoma mimicking calcified fibroadenoma on screening digital breast tomosynthesis mammogram.
Bennett DL; Merenda G; Schnepp S; Lowdermilk MC
Radiol Case Rep; 2017 Dec; 12(4):648-652. PubMed ID: 29484041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications.
Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Kim GR; Ko ES; Park KW
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):319-329. PubMed ID: 29931560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiple Angulated Mammography Reconstructions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the Diagnosis of Microcalcifications - Added Value to Standard Stack Reconstructions and Synthesized Mammography.
Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Wicklein J; Mertelmeier T; Windfuhr-Blum M; Langer M
Rofo; 2018 May; 190(5):433-440. PubMed ID: 29390228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.
Dodelzon K; Simon K; Dou E; Levy AD; Michaels AY; Askin G; Katzen JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tridimensional Matryoshka Tattoo: An Important.
Tammaro A; Iacovino C; Magri F; Capalbo A; Giordano D; Parisella Francesca R; Persechino S; Chello C; De Marco G
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2019 Sep; 27(3):198-199. PubMed ID: 31542068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tattoo pigment mimicking axillary lymph node calcifications on mammography.
Honegger MM; Hesseltine SM; Gross JD; Singer C; Cohen JM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3):831-2. PubMed ID: 15333377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Explorations of breast microcalcifications: Guidelines].
Chamming's F; Chopier J; Mathelin C; Chéreau E
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):960-9. PubMed ID: 26527023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2-Dimensional Digital Mammography Using Specimens.
Byun J; Lee JE; Cha ES; Chung J; Kim JH
Breast Cancer (Auckl); 2017; 11():1178223417703388. PubMed ID: 28469438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
