156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34040691)
1. Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method.
Dong Q; Shi H; Jia Q; Tian Y; Zhi K; Zhang L
Scanning; 2021; 2021():9996857. PubMed ID: 34040691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of condylar asymmetry in different skeletal patterns with cone-beam CT].
Li WY; Chen WJ; Hou W; Qin JW; Duan YF; Mu JQ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2019 Oct; 28(5):523-528. PubMed ID: 32274486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the position and morphology of tongue and hyoid bone in skeletal Class II malocclusion based on cone beam computed tomography.
Chen W; Mou H; Qian Y; Qian L
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):475. PubMed ID: 34579690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Size of the Condyle in Vertical and Anteroposterior Skeletal Conditions with the Help of Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Jyotirmay ; Singh SK; Adarsh K; Sinha A; Kumar A; Sharan S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 34257181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular asymmetry in patients with skeletal class I and skeletal class II Malocclusions: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Wang Y; Wang Y; Wang C; Cao Y; Zhang B; Chen Y; Liu C
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Dec; 124(6):101441. PubMed ID: 36933658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphologic quantification of the maxilla and the mandible with cone-beam computed tomography.
Deguchi T; Katashiba S; Inami T; Foong KW; Huak CY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 20152678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dimension and Location of the Mandibular Lingula: Comparisons of Gender and Skeletal Patterns Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Hsu KJ; Tseng YC; Liang SW; Hsiao SY; Chen CM
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2571534. PubMed ID: 32149093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Arieta-Miranda JM; Silva-Valencia M; Flores-Mir C; Paredes-Sampen NA; Arriola-Guillen LE
Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():36. PubMed ID: 24325842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of mandible symmetry and the occlusal plane of adult patients with high-angle skeletal class III malocclusion and jaw deformity.
Teng C; Liu C; Yu Q; Liu S
Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Jul; 127():105157. PubMed ID: 34015688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.
Hasebe A; Yamaguchi T; Nakawaki T; Hikita Y; Katayama K; Maki K
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30475648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating mandibular symphysis bone density according to various skeletal patterns with CBCT.
Gousman J; Park JH; Chae JM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):70-77. PubMed ID: 32599658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship of the airway size to the mandible distance in Chinese skeletal Class I and Class II adults with normal vertical facial pattern.
Firwana A; Wang H; Sun L; Wang J; Zhang WB
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(3):368-374. PubMed ID: 31397410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of mandibular volume classified by vertical skeletal dimensions with cone-beam computed tomography.
Nakawaki T; Yamaguchi T; Tomita D; Hikita Y; Adel M; Katayama K; Maki K
Angle Orthod; 2016 Nov; 86(6):949-954. PubMed ID: 27007754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D cephalometry on reduced FOV CBCT: skeletal class assessment through AF-BF on Frankfurt plane-validity and reliability through comparison with 2D measurements.
Farronato M; Maspero C; Abate A; Grippaudo C; Connelly ST; Tartaglia GM
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6295-6302. PubMed ID: 32382843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Craniofacial features affecting mandibular asymmetries in skeletal Class II patients.
Thiesen G; Gribel BF; Freitas MPM; Oliver DR; Kim KB
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):437-445. PubMed ID: 28667433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Morphological analysis of alveolar bone of anterior mandible in high-angle skeletal class II and class III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography].
Ma J; Jiang JH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 50(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 29483730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis.
Chen H; Liu Z; Hu X; Wu B; Gu Y
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):238. PubMed ID: 33952217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular characteristics in patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion and chin deviation.
Lv W; Nie Q; Gu Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Sep; 160(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 34175163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skeletal and dental asymmetries in Class II subdivision malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography.
Sanders DA; Rigali PH; Neace WP; Uribe F; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):542.e1-20; discussion 542-3. PubMed ID: 21055586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
