158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34041978)
1. Guiding vacuum-assisted biopsy in prone position: digital breast tomosynthesis vs stereotactic.
Scaperrotta GP; Boffelli G; Depretto C; Di Leo G; Liguori A; Monaco CG; Borelli A; Ferranti C
Tumori; 2022 Aug; 108(4):326-330. PubMed ID: 34041978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Schrading S; Distelmaier M; Dirrichs T; Detering S; Brolund L; Strobel K; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 25386875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided versus Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy.
Bahl M; Maunglay M; D'Alessandro HA; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30511909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical performance of digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy: a single-institution experience in Japan.
Ido M; Saito M; Banno H; Ito Y; Goto M; Ando T; Kousaka J; Mouri Y; Fujii K; Imai T; Nakano S; Suzuki K; Murotani K
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):2. PubMed ID: 36604648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Diagnostic Mammography-Guided Biopsy and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Calcifications: Results in 1354 Biopsies.
Nguyen DL; Boron A; Oluyemi ET; Myers KS; Mullen LA; Ambinder EB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):212-223. PubMed ID: 36102725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of Vacuum-Assisted Breast Cone-Beam CT-Guided Biopsy and Comparison With Prone Stereotactic Biopsy.
Wienbeck S; Lotz J; Fischer U
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1154-1162. PubMed ID: 28199139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy of Architectural Distortion Without a Sonographic Correlate: A Retrospective Review.
Ambinder EB; Plotkin A; Euhus D; Mullen LA; Oluyemi E; Di Carlo P; Philip M; Panigrahi B; Cimino-Mathews A; Myers KS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):845-854. PubMed ID: 33147055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital breast Tomosynthesis vacuum assisted biopsy for Tomosynthesis-detected Sonographically occult lesions.
Ariaratnam NS; Little ST; Whitley MA; Ferguson K
Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():4-8. PubMed ID: 28806573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions.
Cohen EO; Korhonen KE; Sun J; Leung JWT
Eur Radiol; 2023 Sep; 33(9):6189-6203. PubMed ID: 37042980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonography as a Guiding Method in Breast Micro-Calcification Vacuum-Assisted Biopsies.
Keränen AK; Haapea M; Rissanen T
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Oct; 37(5):497-502. PubMed ID: 27737482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonographically-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy with digital mammography-guided skin marking of suspicious breast microcalcifications: comparison of outcomes with stereotactic biopsy in Asian women.
Hahn SY; Shin JH; Han BK; Ko EY
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 21498322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical benefits of tomosynthesis-guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy: a comparison with stereotactic vacuum assisted biopsy.
Kasahara M; Kanematsu S; Tanaka Y; Okazaki S; Watatani M
Breast Cancer; 2024 Mar; 31(2):329-334. PubMed ID: 38324059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prone Versus Upright Digital Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy.
Choudhery S; Johnson M; Fazzio RT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):760-764. PubMed ID: 32755154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions.
Tsai HY; Huang ST; Chao MF; Kan JY; Hsu JS; Hou MF; Chiu HC
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():108982. PubMed ID: 32334370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequency of Discordant Lesions and False-negative Cancers at Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy.
Heller SL; Jaglan S; Babb JS; Melsaether A; Toth HB; Moy L
Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):994-9. PubMed ID: 27161209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A feasibility study.
Waldherr C; Berclaz G; Altermatt HJ; Cerny P; Keller P; Dietz U; Buser K; Ciriolo M; Sonnenschein MJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1582-9. PubMed ID: 26385802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of suspicious calcifications at different sites within one breast: Is biopsy of more than one location needed?
Bode M; Charlotte Huck L; Raaff V; Hitpass L; Braunschweig T; Nebelung S; Katharina Kuhl C
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 154():110456. PubMed ID: 35914364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects on short-term quality of life of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography.
Tagliafico A; Gristina L; Bignotti B; Valdora F; Tosto S; Calabrese M
Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1056):20150593. PubMed ID: 26463101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
