These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34041986)

  • 1. Comparison of Behavioral and Physiological Measures of the Status of the Cochlear Nonlinearity.
    Fereczkowski M; Dau T; MacDonald EN
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211016155. PubMed ID: 34041986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forward-masking recovery and the assumptions of the temporal masking curve method of inferring cochlear compression.
    Pérez-González P; Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Trends Hear; 2014 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 25534365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of Instantaneous Compression on Recognition of Speech in Noise with Temporal Dips.
    Rasetshwane DM; Raybine DA; Kopun JG; Gorga MP; Neely ST
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 30461387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the Interplay Between Cochlear Gain Loss and Temporal Envelope Coding Deficits.
    Verhulst S; Piktel P; Jagadeesh A; Mauermann M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():467-475. PubMed ID: 27080688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rosengard PS; Oxenham AJ; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3028-41. PubMed ID: 15957772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism.
    Moore BC; Vickers DA; Plack CJ; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2761-78. PubMed ID: 10573892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling temporal and compressive properties of the normal and impaired auditory system.
    Derleth RP; Dau T; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2001 Sep; 159(1-2):132-49. PubMed ID: 11520641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Oxenham AJ; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3666-75. PubMed ID: 9193054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal integration, frequency resolution, and off-frequency listening in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Hall JW; Fernandes MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1172-7. PubMed ID: 6643838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.
    Oxenham AJ; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2248-57. PubMed ID: 15532656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-term temporal integration: evidence for the influence of peripheral compression.
    Oxenham AJ; Moore BC; Vickers DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3676-87. PubMed ID: 9193055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2149-63. PubMed ID: 19062855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectrotemporal analysis and cochlear hearing impairment: effects of frequency selectivity, temporal resolution, signal frequency, and rate of modulation.
    Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2550-62. PubMed ID: 2745879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modulation Detection Interference (MDI) in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.
    Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):680-6. PubMed ID: 8084198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectro-temporal analysis in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Hall JW; Davis AC; Haggard MP; Pillsbury HC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1325-31. PubMed ID: 3198867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate estimation of compression in simultaneous masking enables the simulation of hearing impairment for normal-hearing listeners.
    Irino T; Fukawatase T; Sakaguchi M; Nisimura R; Kawahara H; Patterson RD
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():73-80. PubMed ID: 23716211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.