These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34042414)

  • 1. Assessment of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Smartphone-based 6-minute Walking Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.
    Zeitlberger AM; Sosnova M; Ziga M; Regli L; Bozinov O; Weyerbrock A; Stienen MN; Maldaner N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Sep; 46(18):E959-E965. PubMed ID: 34042414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the 6-minute walking test as a smartphone app-based self-measurement of objective functional impairment in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease.
    Maldaner N; Sosnova M; Zeitlberger AM; Ziga M; Gautschi OP; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Stienen MN;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 Dec; 33(6):779-788. PubMed ID: 32764182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective outcome measures may demonstrate continued change in functional recovery in patients with ceiling effects of subjective patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders.
    Ziga M; Sosnova M; Zeitlberger AM; Regli L; Bozinov O; Weyerbrock A; Ratliff JK; Stienen MN; Maldaner N
    Spine J; 2023 Sep; 23(9):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 37182704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. External Validation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Timed-up-and-go Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.
    Maldaner N; Sosnova M; Ziga M; Zeitlberger AM; Bozinov O; Gautschi OP; Weyerbrock A; Regli L; Stienen MN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Feb; 47(4):337-342. PubMed ID: 34033596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longitudinal smartphone-based self-assessment of objective functional impairment in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease: initial experience.
    Sosnova M; Zeitlberger AM; Ziga M; Gautschi OP; Weyerbrock A; Stienen MN; Maldaner N
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2020 Sep; 162(9):2061-2068. PubMed ID: 32405670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normative data of a smartphone app-based 6-minute walking test, test-retest reliability, and content validity with patient-reported outcome measures.
    Tosic L; Goldberger E; Maldaner N; Sosnova M; Zeitlberger AM; Staartjes VE; Gadjradj PS; Eversdijk HAJ; Quddusi A; Gandía-González ML; Sayadi JJ; Desai A; Regli L; Gautschi OP; Stienen MN
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 May; 33(4):480-489. PubMed ID: 32470938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responsiveness of the self-measured 6-minute walking test and the Timed Up and Go test in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders.
    Maldaner N; Sosnova M; Zeitlberger AM; Ziga M; Gautschi OP; Regli L; Bozinov O; Weyerbrock A; Stienen MN
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 May; 35(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 33974372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Joswig H; Corniola MV; Bellut D; Prömmel P; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E4. PubMed ID: 31042663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Timed Up and Go Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.
    Gautschi OP; Stienen MN; Corniola MV; Joswig H; Schaller K; Hildebrandt G; Smoll NR
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 27352275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patients undergoing surgery for lumbar degenerative spinal disorders favor smartphone-based objective self-assessment over paper-based patient-reported outcome measures.
    Sosnova M; Zeitlberger AM; Ziga M; Gautschi OP; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Bozinov O; Stienen MN; Maldaner N
    Spine J; 2021 Apr; 21(4):610-617. PubMed ID: 33346155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of Patient-reported Outcomes Measures After Single-level Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty, Multi-level Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty, and the Lumbar Hybrid Procedure for the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease.
    Scott-Young M; Lee SMS; Nielsen D; Rathbone E; Rackham M; Hing W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Mar; 47(5):377-386. PubMed ID: 34559766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External Validation of the Timed Up and Go Test as Measure of Objective Functional Impairment in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.
    Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Sosnova M; Zeitlberger AM; Ziga M; Weyerbrock A; Bozinov O; Gautschi OP
    Neurosurgery; 2021 Jan; 88(2):E142-E149. PubMed ID: 33040156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the visual analog scale in the cervical spine.
    MacDowall A; Skeppholm M; Robinson Y; Olerud C
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):227-235. PubMed ID: 29243996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.