These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34042768)

  • 1. Automatic Detection of Metadata Errors in a Registry of Clinical Studies Using Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Graphs.
    Keuchel D; Spicher N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():372-376. PubMed ID: 34042768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SHACL-Based Report Quality Evaluation for Health IT-Induced Medication Errors.
    Keuchel D; Spicher N; Wang J; Völcker M; Gong Y; Deserno TM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jun; 290():414-418. PubMed ID: 35673047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validating EHR clinical models using ontology patterns.
    Martínez-Costa C; Schulz S
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Dec; 76():124-137. PubMed ID: 29113934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Information Does Your EHR Contain? Automatic Generation of a Clinical Metadata Warehouse (CMDW) to Support Identification and Data Access Within Distributed Clinical Research Networks.
    Bruland P; Doods J; Storck M; Dugas M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():313-317. PubMed ID: 29295106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Verifying Data Integration Configurations for Semantical Correctness and Completeness.
    Stöhr MR; Günther A; Majeed RW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Sep; 267():66-73. PubMed ID: 31483256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting and correcting misclassified sequences in the large-scale public databases.
    Bagheri H; Severin AJ; Rajan H
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 36(18):4699-4705. PubMed ID: 32579213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metadata of Registries: Results from an Initiative in Health Services Research.
    Stausberg J; Harkener S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():18-22. PubMed ID: 34042697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An automatic method for the enrichment of DICOM metadata using biomedical ontologies.
    Perez W; Tello A; Saquicela V; Vidal ME; La Cruz A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():2551-4. PubMed ID: 26736812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obstacles to the reuse of study metadata in ClinicalTrials.gov.
    Miron L; Gonçalves RS; Musen MA
    Sci Data; 2020 Dec; 7(1):443. PubMed ID: 33339830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discovery of Biomedical Databases Through Semantic Questioning.
    Pereira A; Almeida JR; Lopes RP; Pazos A; Oliveira JL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 May; 294():585-586. PubMed ID: 35612156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic Conversion of Metadata from the Study of Health in Pomerania to ODM.
    Hegselmann S; Gessner S; Neuhaus P; Henke J; Schmidt CO; Dugas M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 236():88-96. PubMed ID: 28508783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishing semantic interoperability of biomedical metadata registries using extended semantic relationships.
    Park YR; Yoon YJ; Kim HH; Kim JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():618-21. PubMed ID: 23920630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Composite CDE: modeling composite relationships between common data elements for representing complex clinical data.
    Kim HH; Park YR; Lee S; Kim JH
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jul; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 32620117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Registries for rare diseases : OSSE - An open-source framework for technical implementation].
    Storf H; Schaaf J; Kadioglu D; Göbel J; Wagner TOF; Ückert F
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2017 May; 60(5):523-531. PubMed ID: 28289778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Achieving interoperability for metadata registries using comparative object modeling.
    Park YR; Kim JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 2):1136-9. PubMed ID: 20841861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A reference data model of a metadata registry preserving semantics and representations of data elements.
    Löpprich M; Jones J; Meinecke MC; Goldschmidt H; Knaup P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():368-72. PubMed ID: 25160208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foundations of a metadata repository for databases of registers and trials.
    Stausberg J; Löbe M; Verplancke P; Drepper J; Herre H; Löffler M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():409-13. PubMed ID: 19745342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic generation of computable implementation guides from clinical information models.
    Boscá D; Maldonado JA; Moner D; Robles M
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Jun; 55():143-52. PubMed ID: 25910958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metadata Definition in Registries: What Is a Data Element?
    Stausberg J; Harkener S; Burgmer M; Engel C; Finger R; Heinz C; Jenetzky E; Martin D; Rupp R; Schoenthaler M; Schuld C; Suwelack B; Wegner J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 May; 294():174-178. PubMed ID: 35612051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of classifications and terminologies in Metadata registries based on ISO/IEC 11179.
    Ngouongo SM; Stausberg J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():744-8. PubMed ID: 21893846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.