BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34042768)

  • 1. Automatic Detection of Metadata Errors in a Registry of Clinical Studies Using Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) Graphs.
    Keuchel D; Spicher N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():372-376. PubMed ID: 34042768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SHACL-Based Report Quality Evaluation for Health IT-Induced Medication Errors.
    Keuchel D; Spicher N; Wang J; Völcker M; Gong Y; Deserno TM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jun; 290():414-418. PubMed ID: 35673047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validating EHR clinical models using ontology patterns.
    Martínez-Costa C; Schulz S
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Dec; 76():124-137. PubMed ID: 29113934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Information Does Your EHR Contain? Automatic Generation of a Clinical Metadata Warehouse (CMDW) to Support Identification and Data Access Within Distributed Clinical Research Networks.
    Bruland P; Doods J; Storck M; Dugas M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():313-317. PubMed ID: 29295106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Verifying Data Integration Configurations for Semantical Correctness and Completeness.
    Stöhr MR; Günther A; Majeed RW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Sep; 267():66-73. PubMed ID: 31483256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting and correcting misclassified sequences in the large-scale public databases.
    Bagheri H; Severin AJ; Rajan H
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 36(18):4699-4705. PubMed ID: 32579213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metadata of Registries: Results from an Initiative in Health Services Research.
    Stausberg J; Harkener S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():18-22. PubMed ID: 34042697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An automatic method for the enrichment of DICOM metadata using biomedical ontologies.
    Perez W; Tello A; Saquicela V; Vidal ME; La Cruz A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():2551-4. PubMed ID: 26736812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obstacles to the reuse of study metadata in ClinicalTrials.gov.
    Miron L; Gonçalves RS; Musen MA
    Sci Data; 2020 Dec; 7(1):443. PubMed ID: 33339830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discovery of Biomedical Databases Through Semantic Questioning.
    Pereira A; Almeida JR; Lopes RP; Pazos A; Oliveira JL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 May; 294():585-586. PubMed ID: 35612156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic Conversion of Metadata from the Study of Health in Pomerania to ODM.
    Hegselmann S; Gessner S; Neuhaus P; Henke J; Schmidt CO; Dugas M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 236():88-96. PubMed ID: 28508783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishing semantic interoperability of biomedical metadata registries using extended semantic relationships.
    Park YR; Yoon YJ; Kim HH; Kim JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():618-21. PubMed ID: 23920630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Composite CDE: modeling composite relationships between common data elements for representing complex clinical data.
    Kim HH; Park YR; Lee S; Kim JH
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jul; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 32620117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Registries for rare diseases : OSSE - An open-source framework for technical implementation].
    Storf H; Schaaf J; Kadioglu D; Göbel J; Wagner TOF; Ückert F
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2017 May; 60(5):523-531. PubMed ID: 28289778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Achieving interoperability for metadata registries using comparative object modeling.
    Park YR; Kim JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 2):1136-9. PubMed ID: 20841861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A reference data model of a metadata registry preserving semantics and representations of data elements.
    Löpprich M; Jones J; Meinecke MC; Goldschmidt H; Knaup P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():368-72. PubMed ID: 25160208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foundations of a metadata repository for databases of registers and trials.
    Stausberg J; Löbe M; Verplancke P; Drepper J; Herre H; Löffler M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():409-13. PubMed ID: 19745342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic generation of computable implementation guides from clinical information models.
    Boscá D; Maldonado JA; Moner D; Robles M
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Jun; 55():143-52. PubMed ID: 25910958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metadata Definition in Registries: What Is a Data Element?
    Stausberg J; Harkener S; Burgmer M; Engel C; Finger R; Heinz C; Jenetzky E; Martin D; Rupp R; Schoenthaler M; Schuld C; Suwelack B; Wegner J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 May; 294():174-178. PubMed ID: 35612051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of classifications and terminologies in Metadata registries based on ISO/IEC 11179.
    Ngouongo SM; Stausberg J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():744-8. PubMed ID: 21893846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.