BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34043091)

  • 1. Effect of the Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Margin Consensus Guideline Implementation on Re-Excision Rates, Satisfaction, and Cost.
    Bhutiani N; Holland MM; Mercer MK; Donaldson M; Berry TS; McMasters KM; Ajkay N
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Nov; 28(12):7432-7438. PubMed ID: 34043091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of consensus guidelines for breast-conserving surgery in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Tremelling A; Aft RL; Cyr AE; Gillanders WE; Glover-Collins K; Herrmann V; Margenthaler JA
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 May; 5(5):e1502. PubMed ID: 34245135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adoption of SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: What Is the Impact on Use of Additional Surgery?
    Mamtani A; Romanoff A; Baser R; Vincent A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):295-302. PubMed ID: 32500343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the Effect of Margin Consensus Guideline Publication on Operative Patterns and Financial Impact of Breast Cancer Operation.
    Bhutiani N; Mercer MK; Bachman KC; Heidrich SR; Martin RCG; Scoggins CR; McMasters KM; Ajkay N
    J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Jul; 227(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 29428232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraoperative Pathologic Margin Analysis and Re-Excision to Minimize Reoperation for Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Racz JM; Glasgow AE; Keeney GL; Degnim AC; Hieken TJ; Jakub JW; Cheville JC; Habermann EB; Boughey JC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Dec; 27(13):5303-5311. PubMed ID: 32623609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland.
    Tang SS; Kaptanis S; Haddow JB; Mondani G; Elsberger B; Tasoulis MK; Obondo C; Johns N; Ismail W; Syed A; Kissias P; Venn M; Sundaramoorthy S; Irwin G; Sami AS; Elfadl D; Baggaley A; Remoundos DD; Langlands F; Charalampoudis P; Barber Z; Hamilton-Burke WLS; Khan A; Sirianni C; Merker LAG; Saha S; Lane RA; Chopra S; Dupré S; Manning AT; St John ER; Musbahi A; Dlamini N; McArdle CL; Wright C; Murphy JO; Aggarwal R; Dordea M; Bosch K; Egbeare D; Osman H; Tayeh S; Razi F; Iqbal J; Ledwidge SFC; Albert V; Masannat Y
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():315-324. PubMed ID: 28865259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. American Society of Breast Surgeons' Practice Patterns After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO-ASCO DCIS Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation.
    DeSnyder SM; Hunt KK; Dong W; Smith BD; Moran MS; Chavez-MacGregor M; Shen Y; Kuerer HM; Lucci A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):2965-2974. PubMed ID: 29987598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of systematic cavity shave margins in breast-conserving surgery at a large community hospital with a low baseline re-excision rate.
    Vetter C; Ashok A; Perez M; Musaad S; Rahimi G; Gohil K; Higham A
    Breast J; 2020 Oct; 26(10):1960-1965. PubMed ID: 33078470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
    Rosenberger LH; Mamtani A; Fuzesi S; Stempel M; Eaton A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3239-46. PubMed ID: 27411549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
    Edwards BL; Guidry CA; Larson KN; Novicoff WM; Harvey JA; Schroen AT
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 26471488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors influencing suboptimal pathologic margins and re-excision following breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ.
    Dhak S; Baliski C; Bakos B
    Am J Surg; 2023 May; 225(5):866-870. PubMed ID: 36894415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K
    Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: A large retrospective study from a single institution.
    Miligy IM; Toss MS; Khout H; Whisker L; Burrell HC; Ellis IO; Green AR; Macmillan D; Rakha EA
    Breast J; 2019 Nov; 25(6):1143-1153. PubMed ID: 31318120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
    Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
    Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
    Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of surgeon performed intraoperative specimen ink in breast conservation surgery.
    Van Den Bruele AB; Jasra B; Smotherman C; Crandall M; Samiian L
    J Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 231():441-447. PubMed ID: 30278966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Breast-Conserving Surgery Re-excision on Patient-Reported Outcomes Using the BREAST-Q.
    Matar-Ujvary R; Haglich K; Flanagan MR; Fuzesi S; Sevilimedu V; Nelson JA; Gemignani ML
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Sep; 30(9):5341-5349. PubMed ID: 37306849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rate of re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for invasive lobular carcinoma.
    Wanis ML; Wong JA; Rodriguez S; Wong JM; Jabo B; Ashok A; Lum SS; Solomon NL; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA; Senthil M
    Am Surg; 2013 Oct; 79(10):1119-22. PubMed ID: 24160812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.