These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34043802)

  • 1. On the Origin of Frameshift-Robustness of the Standard Genetic Code.
    Xu H; Zhang J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Sep; 38(10):4301-4309. PubMed ID: 34043802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimality of circular codes versus the genetic code after frameshift errors.
    Dila G; Michel CJ; Thompson JD
    Biosystems; 2020 Jul; 195():104134. PubMed ID: 32251681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of the standard genetic code in terms of two mutation types: Point mutations and frameshifts.
    Wnętrzak M; Błażej P; Mackiewicz P
    Biosystems; 2019 Jul; 181():44-50. PubMed ID: 31042561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frameshift and wild-type proteins are often highly similar because the genetic code and genomes were optimized for frameshift tolerance.
    Wang X; Dong Q; Chen G; Zhang J; Liu Y; Cai Y
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):416. PubMed ID: 35655139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of the genetic code: partial optimization of a random code for robustness to translation error in a rugged fitness landscape.
    Novozhilov AS; Wolf YI; Koonin EV
    Biol Direct; 2007 Oct; 2():24. PubMed ID: 17956616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The optimality of the standard genetic code assessed by an eight-objective evolutionary algorithm.
    Wnętrzak M; Błażej P; Mackiewicz D; Mackiewicz P
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):192. PubMed ID: 30545289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the efficiency of the genetic code after frameshift mutations.
    Geyer R; Madany Mamlouk A
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4825. PubMed ID: 29844977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Many alternative and theoretical genetic codes are more robust to amino acid replacements than the standard genetic code.
    Błażej P; Wnętrzak M; Mackiewicz D; Gagat P; Mackiewicz P
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Mar; 464():21-32. PubMed ID: 30579955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimization of the standard genetic code according to three codon positions using an evolutionary algorithm.
    Błażej P; Wnętrzak M; Mackiewicz D; Mackiewicz P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201715. PubMed ID: 30092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The neutral emergence of error minimized genetic codes superior to the standard genetic code.
    Massey SE
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Nov; 408():237-242. PubMed ID: 27544417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The genetic code is one in a million.
    Freeland SJ; Hurst LD
    J Mol Evol; 1998 Sep; 47(3):238-48. PubMed ID: 9732450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of the optimality of the standard genetic code.
    Kumar B; Saini S
    Mol Biosyst; 2016 Jul; 12(8):2642-51. PubMed ID: 27327359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Theories of the origin of the genetic code: Strong corroboration for the coevolution theory.
    Di Giulio M
    Biosystems; 2024 May; 239():105217. PubMed ID: 38663520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model of Genetic Code Structure Evolution under Various Types of Codon Reading.
    Błażej P; Pawlak K; Mackiewicz D; Mackiewicz P
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Feb; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35163612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Origin and Evolution of the Universal Genetic Code.
    Koonin EV; Novozhilov AS
    Annu Rev Genet; 2017 Nov; 51():45-62. PubMed ID: 28853922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multiobjective approach to the genetic code adaptability problem.
    de Oliveira LL; de Oliveira PS; Tinós R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16():52. PubMed ID: 25879480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is the Genetic Code Optimized for Resource Conservation?
    Xu H; Zhang J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Oct; 38(11):5122-5126. PubMed ID: 34383940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Average and Standard Deviation of the Error Function for Random Genetic Codes with Standard Stop Codons.
    Salinas DG
    Acta Biotheor; 2021 Dec; 70(1):7. PubMed ID: 34919168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitting the standard genetic code into its triplet table.
    Yarus M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(36):. PubMed ID: 34462348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A four-column theory for the origin of the genetic code: tracing the evolutionary pathways that gave rise to an optimized code.
    Higgs PG
    Biol Direct; 2009 Apr; 4():16. PubMed ID: 19393096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.