507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34044798)
21. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus six days of filgrastim for preventing febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
Danova M; Chiroli S; Rosti G; Doan QV
Tumori; 2009; 95(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 19579869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Efficacy and safety of RGB-02, a pegfilgrastim biosimilar to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: results of a randomized, double-blind phase III clinical study vs. reference pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Kahan Z; Grecea D; Smakal M; Tjulandin S; Bondarenko I; Perjesi L; Illes A; Horvat-Karajz K; Aradi I
BMC Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):122. PubMed ID: 30727980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Randomized phase 3 efficacy and safety trial of proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar MYL-1401H in the prophylactic treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
Waller CF; Ranganna GM; Pennella EJ; Blakeley C; Bronchud MH; Mattano LA; Berzoy O; Voitko N; Shparyk Y; Lytvyn I; Rusyn A; Popov V; Láng I; Beckmann K; Sharma R; Baczkowski M; Kothekar M; Barve A
Ann Hematol; 2019 May; 98(5):1217-1224. PubMed ID: 30824956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Incidence and risk factors for febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP: 2-year experience in a single center (STOP FN in NHL 2).
Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Nishihara A; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Terui Y; Nukada T; Nomura T; Hatake K
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Feb; 28(2):571-579. PubMed ID: 31093770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF).
Naeim A; Henk HJ; Becker L; Chia V; Badre S; Li X; Deeter R
BMC Cancer; 2013 Jan; 13():11. PubMed ID: 23298389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Retrospective evaluation of safety and effectiveness of same-day pegfilgrastim in patients with lung cancer.
Alrawashdh N; Vraney J; Choi BM; Almutairi AR; Abraham I; McBride A
Future Oncol; 2022 Jun; 18(19):2381-2390. PubMed ID: 35477322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with early discontinuation of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice.
Weycker D; Li X; Barron R; Li Y; Reiner M; Kartashov A; Figueredo J; Tzivelekis S; Garcia J
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Jun; 24(6):2481-90. PubMed ID: 26670915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparison of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim for the Primary Prophylactic Effect for Preventing Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Rituximab with Dose-adjusted EPOCH Chemotherapy].
Kataoka T; Sakurashita H; Taogoshi T; Nishigakiuchi R; Murase T; Izumitani S; Saeki Y; Matsuo H
Yakugaku Zasshi; 2019; 139(4):629-633. PubMed ID: 30930398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim-cbqv in patients with lymphoma receiving CHOP-like chemotherapy.
McBride A; Alrawashdh N; Bartels T; Moore L; Persky D; Abraham I
Future Oncol; 2021 Sep; 17(26):3485-3497. PubMed ID: 34241542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A prospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector versus other options for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia: breast cancer subgroup analysis.
Mahtani RL; Belani R; Crawford J; Dale D; DeCosta L; Gawade PL; Huynh C; Lawrence T; Lewis S; MacLaughlin WW; Narang M; Rifkin R
Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6135-6144. PubMed ID: 35426046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices.
Rifkin RM; Crawford J; Mahtani RL; Dale DC; Narang M; MacLaughlin WW; Huynh C; Gawade PL; Lewis S; DeCosta L; Lawrence T; Belani R
Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):7913-7922. PubMed ID: 35732748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimal timing for pegfilgrastim administration in Japanese breast cancer patients receiving intermediate-risk chemotherapies.
Hayama T; Sakurai K; Miura K; Washinosu S; Tsuboi S; Uchiike A; Yoshida Y; Takei M
Int J Clin Pharm; 2018 Oct; 40(5):997-1000. PubMed ID: 29855985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study.
Almenar D; Mayans J; Juan O; Bueno JM; Lopez JI; Frau A; Guinot M; Cerezuela P; Buscalla EG; Gasquet JA; Sanchez J
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 May; 18(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 19076208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of prophylactic pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in the US: A review of adherence to present guidelines for usage.
Crawford J; Moore DC; Morrison VA; Dale D
Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2021; 29():100466. PubMed ID: 34655862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Patterns of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in older Medicare patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Schenfeld J; Gong T; Henry D; Kelsh M; Gawade P; Peng Y; Bradbury BD; Li S
Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6327-6338. PubMed ID: 35482126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
Mądry R; Popławska L; Haslbauer F; Šafanda M; Ghizdavescu D; Benkovicova J; Csőszi T; Mihaylov G; Niepel D; Jaeger C; Frkanova I; Macovei A; Staudigl C
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2016 Apr; 128(7-8):238-47. PubMed ID: 26745973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prophylactic antibiotics or G(M)-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.
Skoetz N; Bohlius J; Engert A; Monsef I; Blank O; Vehreschild JJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Dec; 2015(12):CD007107. PubMed ID: 26687844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
