187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34047405)
1. Induction of labor or expectant management? Birth outcomes for nulliparous individuals choosing midwifery care.
Erickson EN; Bailey JM; Colo SD; Carlson NS; Tilden EL
Birth; 2021 Dec; 48(4):501-513. PubMed ID: 34047405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cesarean delivery after non-medically indicated induction of labor: A population-based study using different definitions of expectant management.
Zenzmaier C; Pfeifer B; Leitner H; König-Bachmann M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Feb; 100(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 32880895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.
Palatnik A; Kominiarek MA
Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun; 37(7):695-707. PubMed ID: 31039597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Likelihood of primary cesarean section following induction of labor in singleton cephalic pregnancies at term, compared with expectant management: An Australian population-based, historical cohort study.
Hu Y; Homer CSE; Ellwood D; Slavin V; Vogel JP; Enticott J; Callander EJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 May; 103(5):946-954. PubMed ID: 38291953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk.
Sinkey RG; Lacevic J; Reljic T; Hozo I; Gibson KS; Odibo AO; Djulbegovic B; Lockwood CJ
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0193169. PubMed ID: 29694344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age.
Hersh AR; Urbanowicz E; Garg B; Schmidt EM; Packer CH; Caughey AB
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1061-e1068. PubMed ID: 36452970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elective Induction of Labor or Expectant Management: Outcomes Among Nulliparous Women with Uncomplicated Pregnancies.
Lewis S; Zhao Z; Schorn M
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2022 Mar; 67(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35107213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of labor induction at 39 weeks in pregnancies with a prior cesarean delivery.
Park BY; Cryer A; Betoni J; McLean L; Figueroa H; Contag SA; Yao R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Aug; 35(15):2853-2858. PubMed ID: 32847441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre.
Zhao Y; Flatley C; Kumar S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Feb; 57(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 28251626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of labor induction at 39 weeks gestation compared with expectant management on maternal and perinatal morbidity among a cohort of low-risk women.
Burn SC; Yao R; Diaz M; Rossi J; Contag S
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):9208-9214. PubMed ID: 34965815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of labor versus expectant management of large-for-gestational-age infants in nulliparous women.
Moldéus K; Cheng YW; Wikström AK; Stephansson O
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180748. PubMed ID: 28727729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Timing of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes.
Feghali MN; Caritis SN; Catov JM; Scifres CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):243.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26976558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association of Term Labor Induction vs Expectant Management With Child Academic Outcomes.
Werner EF; Schlichting LE; Grobman WA; Viner-Brown S; Clark M; Vivier PM
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e202503. PubMed ID: 32275323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Alkmark M; Keulen JKJ; Kortekaas JC; Bergh C; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Hagberg H; Mol BW; Molin M; van der Post JAM; Saltvedt S; Wikström AK; Wennerholm UB; de Miranda E
PLoS Med; 2020 Dec; 17(12):e1003436. PubMed ID: 33290410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labour at 39 weeks and adverse outcomes in low-risk pregnancies according to ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and parity: A national cohort study in England.
Muller P; Karia AM; Webster K; Carroll F; Dunn G; Frémeaux A; Harris T; Knight H; Oddie S; Khalil A; Van Der Meulen J; Gurol-Urganci I
PLoS Med; 2023 Jul; 20(7):e1004259. PubMed ID: 37471395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labor versus expectant management in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes between 34 and 37 weeks: a randomized controlled trial.
van der Ham DP; Vijgen SM; Nijhuis JG; van Beek JJ; Opmeer BC; Mulder AL; Moonen R; Groenewout M; van Pampus MG; Mantel GD; Bloemenkamp KW; van Wijngaarden WJ; Sikkema M; Haak MC; Pernet PJ; Porath M; Molkenboer JF; Kuppens S; Kwee A; Kars ME; Woiski M; Weinans MJ; Wildschut HI; Akerboom BM; Mol BW; Willekes C;
PLoS Med; 2012; 9(4):e1001208. PubMed ID: 22545024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hersh AR; Skeith AE; Sargent JA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10. PubMed ID: 30768934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
