These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34047929)

  • 41. Fracture liaison: A crucial tool in the fight against fragility fracture.
    Mitchell PJ
    Maturitas; 2022 Nov; 165():26-32. PubMed ID: 35863271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The impact of fracture liaison services on subsequent fractures and mortality: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Li N; Hiligsmann M; Boonen A; van Oostwaard MM; de Bot RTAL; Wyers CE; Bours SPG; van den Bergh JP
    Osteoporos Int; 2021 Aug; 32(8):1517-1530. PubMed ID: 33829285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bridging the osteoporosis treatment gap: performance and cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service.
    Yates CJ; Chauchard MA; Liew D; Bucknill A; Wark JD
    J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 25797867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fragility Fracture Prevention-Implementing a Fracture Liaison Service in a High Volume Orthopedic Hospital.
    Pennestrì F; Corbetta S; Favero V; Banfi G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31817294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Rationale, study design, and descriptive data of the Lucky Bone™ Fracture Liaison Service.
    Senay A; Perreault S; Delisle J; Morin SN; Raynauld JP; Banica A; Troyanov Y; Beaumont P; Jodoin A; Laflamme GY; Leduc S; Mac-Thiong JM; Nguyen H; Ranger P; Rouleau DM; Fernandes JC
    Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Feb; 14(1):19. PubMed ID: 30756193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Capture the Fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle.
    Akesson K; Marsh D; Mitchell PJ; McLellan AR; Stenmark J; Pierroz DD; Kyer C; Cooper C;
    Osteoporos Int; 2013 Aug; 24(8):2135-52. PubMed ID: 23589162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Delivering a quality-assured fracture liaison service in a UK teaching hospital-is it achievable?
    Shipman KE; Stammers J; Doyle A; Gittoes N
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Oct; 27(10):3049-56. PubMed ID: 27193285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Agreement between physicians' and nurses' clinical decisions for the management of the fracture liaison service (4iFLS): the Lucky Bone™ program.
    Senay A; Delisle J; Raynauld JP; Morin SN; Fernandes JC
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Apr; 27(4):1569-1576. PubMed ID: 26602915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A New Fracture Liaison Service Using the Mobile Application and IoT Sensor.
    Kim SW; Won YJ; Chae DS; Chang HJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():3486-3489. PubMed ID: 31946629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effective secondary fracture prevention: implementation of a global benchmarking of clinical quality using the IOF Capture the Fracture® Best Practice Framework tool.
    Javaid MK; Kyer C; Mitchell PJ; Chana J; Moss C; Edwards MH; McLellan AR; Stenmark J; Pierroz DD; Schneider MC; Kanis JA; Akesson K; Cooper C; ;
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Nov; 26(11):2573-8. PubMed ID: 26070301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Improvement in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporosis by a Fracture Liaison Service: feedback from a single French center care pathway.
    Vrignaud A; Pelletier S; Dernis E; Moui Y; Haettich B
    Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Oct; 13(1):110. PubMed ID: 30324242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effectiveness of a minimal resource fracture liaison service.
    Axelsson KF; Jacobsson R; Lund D; Lorentzon M
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Nov; 27(11):3165-3175. PubMed ID: 27230521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Exploring barriers and opportunities to improve osteoporosis care across the acute-to-primary care interface: a qualitative study.
    Bennett MJ; Center JR; Perry L
    Osteoporos Int; 2023 Jul; 34(7):1249-1262. PubMed ID: 37093239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Development of a cloud-based application for the Fracture Liaison Service model of care.
    Holzmueller CG; Karp S; Zeldow D; Lee DB; Thompson DA
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Feb; 27(2):683-90. PubMed ID: 26286624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Commentary: the five Ws of a Fracture Liaison Service: why, who, what, where, and how? In osteoporosis, we reap what we sow.
    Curtis JR; Silverman SL
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2013 Dec; 11(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 24104520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fracture liaison programs.
    Geusens P; Bours SPG; Wyers CE; van den Bergh JP
    Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):278-289. PubMed ID: 31547983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Best practices in secondary fracture prevention: fracture liaison services.
    Mitchell PJ
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2013 Mar; 11(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 23334619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Fracture Liaison Service and Osteoporosis Liaison Service.].
    Hagino H
    Clin Calcium; 2017; 27(9):1225-1231. PubMed ID: 28912384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Persistence and compliance to osteoporosis therapy in a fracture liaison service: a prospective cohort study.
    Senay A; Fernandes JC; Delisle J; Morin SN; Perreault S
    Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Aug; 14(1):87. PubMed ID: 31375983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fracture Liaison Services in the United Kingdom.
    Mitchell PJ
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2013 Dec; 11(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 24026314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.