These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34047929)

  • 61. Danish, national cross-sectional observational study on the prevalence of prior major osteoporotic fractures in adults presenting with hip fracture-limitations and scope for fracture liaison services in prevention of hip fracture.
    Frederiksen A; Abrahamsen B; Johansen PB; Sørensen HA
    Osteoporos Int; 2018 Jan; 29(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 28965215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Orthogeriatric co-management - managing frailty as well as fragility.
    Pioli G; Bendini C; Pignedoli P; Giusti A; Marsh D
    Injury; 2018 Aug; 49(8):1398-1402. PubMed ID: 29921533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. How to prevent the next fracture.
    Mitchell P; Åkesson K
    Injury; 2018 Aug; 49(8):1424-1429. PubMed ID: 29941286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment following vertebral fracture.
    Barton DW; Behrend CJ; Carmouche JJ
    Spine J; 2019 Mar; 19(3):411-417. PubMed ID: 30142455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Establishment of fracture liaison services in Germany].
    Hesse E; Böcker W; Kammerlander C; Stumpf U; Weber I; Maus U
    Unfallchirurg; 2019 Oct; 122(10):766-770. PubMed ID: 31414147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Does a fracture liaison service program minimize recurrent fragility fractures in the elderly with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures?
    Wasfie T; Jackson A; Brock C; Galovska S; McCullough JR; Burgess JA
    Am J Surg; 2019 Mar; 217(3):557-560. PubMed ID: 30274804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. What is a reasonable rate for specific osteoporosis drug therapy in older fragility fracture patients?
    Gosch M; Bail HJ; Grueninger S; Stumpf U; Kammerlander C; Wicklein S
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Feb; 15(1):20. PubMed ID: 32088765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Effectiveness of fracture liaison service in reducing the risk of secondary fragility fractures in adults aged 50 and older: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Danazumi MS; Lightbody N; Dermody G
    Osteoporos Int; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1133-1151. PubMed ID: 38536447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Geisinger high-risk osteoporosis clinic (HiROC): 2013-2015 FLS performance analysis.
    Dunn P; Webb D; Olenginski TP
    Osteoporos Int; 2018 Feb; 29(2):451-457. PubMed ID: 29063214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Implementing a fracture follow-up liaison service: perspective of key stakeholders.
    Luc M; Corriveau H; Boire G; Filiatrault J; Beaulieu MC; Dagenais P; Gaboury I
    Rheumatol Int; 2020 Apr; 40(4):607-614. PubMed ID: 31501995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The Capture the Fracture® Partnership: an overview of a global initiative to increase the secondary fracture prevention care for patient benefit.
    Javaid MK; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Shah A; Mohsin Z; Hiligsmann M; Motek-Soulié A; Fuggle NR; Halbout P; Cooper C
    Osteoporos Int; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1827-1835. PubMed ID: 37418152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Successful implementation of a Fracture Liaison Service through effective change management: a qualitative study.
    Wozniak LA; Beaupre LA; Juby A; Kivi P; Majumdar SR; Hanson HM
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Mar; 15(1):44. PubMed ID: 32166431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Integration of Podiatric Medicine Within the Fracture Liaison Services Model.
    MacRae T; Shofler DW
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2020 Jan; 110(1):Article6. PubMed ID: 32073324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Expected Benefits and Budget Impact From a Microsimulation Model Support the Prioritization and Implementation of Fracture Liaison Services.
    Pinedo-Villanueva R; Burn E; Maronga C; Cooper C; Javaid MK
    J Bone Miner Res; 2023 Apr; 38(4):499-511. PubMed ID: 36662166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effectiveness of a Japanese multi-professional cooperative osteoporosis liaison service at a private hospital for decreasing secondary fractures in osteoporosis patients with fragility fractures.
    Yoshino Y; Tanaka S; Ohama H; Kobayashi S; Tobita H; Kuwagaki K; Fujioka R; Totsuka H; Ichiba Y; Ishimine S; Sakamoto K; Kubo T
    Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Apr; 16(1):75. PubMed ID: 33890181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Return on investment of fracture liaison services: a systematic review and analysis.
    Xu L; Zhao T; Perry L; Frost SA; Di Tanna GL; Wang S; Chen M; Kolt GS; Jan S; Si L
    Osteoporos Int; 2024 Jun; 35(6):951-969. PubMed ID: 38300316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Fracture liaison service in a non-regional orthopaedic clinic--a cost-effective service.
    Ahmed M; Durcan L; O'Beirne J; Quinlan J; Pillay I
    Ir Med J; 2012 Jan; 105(1):24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 22397210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Fracture liaison service: impact on subsequent nonvertebral fracture incidence and mortality.
    Huntjens KM; van Geel TA; van den Bergh JP; van Helden S; Willems P; Winkens B; Eisman JA; Geusens PP; Brink PR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Feb; 96(4):e29. PubMed ID: 24553898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Fracture liaison services: improving outcomes for patients with osteoporosis.
    Walters S; Khan T; Ong T; Sahota O
    Clin Interv Aging; 2017; 12():117-127. PubMed ID: 28138228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Osteoporosis liaison service].
    Suzuki A
    Nihon Rinsho; 2015 Oct; 73(10):1765-9. PubMed ID: 26529944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.