323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34048118)
1. The Trueness of Obturator Prosthesis Base Manufactured by Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques.
Alfaraj A; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 34048118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of manufacturing technologies on the surface accuracy of CAD-CAM occlusal splints.
Orgev A; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):697-705. PubMed ID: 36227731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
Hwang HJ; Lee SJ; Park EJ; Yoon HI
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 30006217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
Yoon HI; Hwang HJ; Ohkubo C; Han JS; Park EJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):919-926. PubMed ID: 29961610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of additive manufacturing process and storage condition on the dimensional accuracy and stability of 3D-printed dental casts.
Yousef H; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 33785200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intaglio surface trueness of milled and 3D-printed digital maxillary and mandibular dentures: A clinical study.
Lo Russo L; Guida L; Zhurakivska K; Troiano G; Chochlidakis K; Ercoli C
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 34116839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trueness and fitting accuracy of maxillary 3D printed complete dentures.
Yoshidome K; Torii M; Kawamura N; Shimpo H; Ohkubo C
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Oct; 65(4):559-564. PubMed ID: 33980786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Fit of Dentures Fabricated by Traditional Techniques Versus CAD/CAM Technology.
McLaughlin JB; Ramos V; Dickinson DP
J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):428-435. PubMed ID: 29136309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Quantitative evaluation of printing accuracy of multi-color and multi-hardness three-dimensional printing dental model with photopolymer jetting].
Shen YR; Chen H; Ma KN; Sun YC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 56(7):652-658. PubMed ID: 34275220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of Build Orientation on the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Mandibular Complete Dentures Manufactured with a Multijet 3D Printer.
Gao H; Yang Z; Lin WS; Tan J; Chen L
J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):684-689. PubMed ID: 33459450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trueness assessment of additively manufactured maxillary complete denture bases produced at different orientations.
Cameron AB; Evans JL; Abuzar MA; Tadakamadla SK; Love RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):129-135. PubMed ID: 35260254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of build orientation and layer thickness on manufacturing accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of 3D printed complete denture bases.
Song S; Zhang J; Liu M; Li F; Bai S
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104435. PubMed ID: 36693587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniques.
Tosun ON; Bilmenoglu C; Özdemir AK
J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):e64-e70. PubMed ID: 36495146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of 3D Printed Implant Casts Versus Stone Casts: A Comparative Study in the Anterior Maxilla.
Banjar A; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 33474754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
Emir F; Ayyildiz S
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of 3D printing compared with milling - A multi-center analysis of try-in dentures.
Herpel C; Tasaka A; Higuchi S; Finke D; Kühle R; Odaka K; Rues S; Lux CJ; Yamashita S; Rammelsberg P; Schwindling FS
J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103681. PubMed ID: 33905767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
