These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34048445)

  • 1. The aesthetic experience of critical art: The effects of the context of an art gallery and the way of providing curatorial information.
    Szubielska M; Imbir K
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250924. PubMed ID: 34048445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of contextual information on aesthetic engagement of artworks.
    Darda KM; Chatterjee A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4273. PubMed ID: 36922537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterizing the emotional response to art beyond pleasure: Correspondence between the emotional characteristics of artworks and viewers' emotional responses.
    Tinio PPL; Gartus A
    Prog Brain Res; 2018; 237():319-342. PubMed ID: 29779742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ugly aesthetic perception associated with emotional changes in experience of art by behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia patients.
    Boutoleau-Bretonnière C; Bretonnière C; Evrard C; Rocher L; Mazzietti A; Koenig O; Vercelletto M; Derkinderen P; Thomas-Antérion C
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():96-104. PubMed ID: 27265766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Art Expertise and Training on Emotion and Preference Ratings for Representational and Abstract Artworks.
    van Paasschen J; Bacci F; Melcher DP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134241. PubMed ID: 26244368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Context effects on emotional and aesthetic evaluations of artworks and IAPS pictures.
    Gerger G; Leder H; Kremer A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():174-83. PubMed ID: 24983515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychophysiological and behavioral responses to descriptive labels in modern art museums.
    Castellotti S; D'Agostino O; Mencarini A; Fabozzi M; Varano R; Mastandrea S; Baldriga I; Del Viva MM
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0284149. PubMed ID: 37134073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contextual and social variables modulate aesthetic appreciation of bodily and abstract art stimuli.
    Era V; Candidi M; Aglioti SM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Aug; 199():102881. PubMed ID: 31352258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What makes an art expert? Emotion and evaluation in art appreciation.
    Leder H; Gerger G; Brieber D; Schwarz N
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(6):1137-47. PubMed ID: 24383619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Art expertise in construing meaning of representational and abstract artworks.
    Bimler DL; Snellock M; Paramei GV
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():11-22. PubMed ID: 30390421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empathy, Einfühlung, and aesthetic experience: the effect of emotion contagion on appreciation of representational and abstract art using fEMG and SCR.
    Gernot G; Pelowski M; Leder H
    Cogn Process; 2018 May; 19(2):147-165. PubMed ID: 28314942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of labels in digital art experience: psychophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Castellotti S; D'Agostino O; Del Viva MM
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1342667. PubMed ID: 39011289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aesthetic experience enhances first-person spatial representation.
    Babo-Rebelo M; Chatel M; Tabacchi S; Namiq A; Travers E; James K; Haggard P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Oct; 119(43):e2201540119. PubMed ID: 36251990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does priming negative emotions really contribute to more positive aesthetic judgments? A comparative study of emotion priming paradigms using emotional faces versus emotional scenes and multiple negative emotions with fEMG.
    Gerger G; Pelowski M; Ishizu T
    Emotion; 2019 Dec; 19(8):1396-1413. PubMed ID: 30475035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stirring images: fear, not happiness or arousal, makes art more sublime.
    Eskine KJ; Kacinik NA; Prinz JJ
    Emotion; 2012 Oct; 12(5):1071-4. PubMed ID: 22309722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study.
    Kirk U; Skov M; Hulme O; Christensen MS; Zeki S
    Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):1125-32. PubMed ID: 19010423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Art in time and space: context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time.
    Brieber D; Nadal M; Leder H; Rosenberg R
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99019. PubMed ID: 24892829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empathy, engagement, entrainment: the interaction dynamics of aesthetic experience.
    Brinck I
    Cogn Process; 2018 May; 19(2):201-213. PubMed ID: 28391411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli.
    Era V; Candidi M; Aglioti SM
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3271-81. PubMed ID: 26238406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shared liking and association valence for representational art but not abstract art.
    Schepman A; Rodway P; Pullen SJ; Kirkham J
    J Vis; 2015; 15(5):11. PubMed ID: 26067529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.