174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34051456)
1. The experiences and psychological outcomes for pregnant women who have had FGM: A systematic review.
Wood R; Richens Y; Lavender T
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2021 Sep; 29():100639. PubMed ID: 34051456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reasons for and Experiences With Surgical Interventions for Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): A Systematic Review.
Berg RC; Taraldsen S; Said MA; Sørbye IK; Vangen S
J Sex Med; 2017 Aug; 14(8):977-990. PubMed ID: 28666656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychological consequences of female genital mutilation: A mixed-method systematic review.
Reman T; Balligand V; Schoefs B; Feipel V; Bertuit J
S Afr J Physiother; 2023; 79(1):1877. PubMed ID: 38855076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combating female genital mutilation: an agenda for the next decade.
Dorkenoo E
World Health Stat Q; 1996; 49(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 9050193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antepartum or intrapartum deinfibulation for childbirth in women with type III female genital mutilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Esu E; Udo A; Okusanya BO; Agamse D; Meremikwu MM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 136 Suppl 1():21-29. PubMed ID: 28164285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Examining the key features of specialist health service provision for women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) in the Global North: a scoping review.
Albert J; Wells M; Spiby H; Evans C
Front Glob Womens Health; 2024; 5():1329819. PubMed ID: 38840583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What do we know about assessing healthcare students and professionals' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding female genital mutilation? A systematic review.
Abdulcadir J; Say L; Pallitto C
Reprod Health; 2017 May; 14(1):64. PubMed ID: 28532515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seeking culturally safe care: a qualitative systematic review of the healthcare experiences of women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting.
Evans C; Tweheyo R; McGarry J; Eldridge J; Albert J; Nkoyo V; Higginbottom GMA
BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027452. PubMed ID: 31147364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deinfibulation for preventing or treating complications in women living with type III female genital mutilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Okusanya BO; Oduwole O; Nwachuku N; Meremikwu MM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 136 Suppl 1():13-20. PubMed ID: 28164296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation on Women's Sexual Health - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Nzinga AM; De Andrade Castanheira S; Hermann J; Feipel V; Kipula AJ; Bertuit J
J Sex Med; 2021 Apr; 18(4):750-760. PubMed ID: 33618990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexual Anatomy and Function in Women With and Without Genital Mutilation: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Abdulcadir J; Botsikas D; Bolmont M; Bilancioni A; Djema DA; Bianchi Demicheli F; Yaron M; Petignat P
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):226-37. PubMed ID: 26827253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of female genital mutilation/cutting on sexual functions.
Biglu MH; Farnam A; Abotalebi P; Biglu S; Ghavami M
Sex Reprod Healthc; 2016 Dec; 10():3-8. PubMed ID: 27938869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Woman and girl-centred care for those affected by female genital mutilation: a scoping review of provider tools and guidelines.
Dawson A; Assifi A; Turkmani S
Reprod Health; 2022 Feb; 19(1):50. PubMed ID: 35193606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A mixed-method synthesis of knowledge, experiences and attitudes of health professionals to Female Genital Mutilation.
Reig-Alcaraz M; Siles-González J; Solano-Ruiz C
J Adv Nurs; 2016 Feb; 72(2):245-60. PubMed ID: 26434563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical management of female genital mutilation-related morbidity: A scoping review.
Chappell AG; Sood R; Hu A; Folsom SM; Wafford QE; Bowen DK; Post LA; Jordan SW
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Oct; 74(10):2467-2478. PubMed ID: 34219039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review of doctors' experiences and needs to support the care of women with female genital mutilation.
Dawson A; Homer CS; Turkmani S; Black K; Varol N
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 131(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 26118329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Berg RC; Underland V; Odgaard-Jensen J; Fretheim A; Vist GE
BMJ Open; 2014 Nov; 4(11):e006316. PubMed ID: 25416059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What are the experiences of seeking, receiving and providing FGM-related healthcare? Perspectives of health professionals and women/girls who have undergone FGM: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence.
Evans C; Tweheyo R; McGarry J; Eldridge J; McCormick C; Nkoyo V; Higginbottom GMA
BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e018170. PubMed ID: 29247096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Crossing cultural divides: A qualitative systematic review of factors influencing the provision of healthcare related to female genital mutilation from the perspective of health professionals.
Evans C; Tweheyo R; McGarry J; Eldridge J; Albert J; Nkoyo V; Higginbottom G
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0211829. PubMed ID: 30830904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
